Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/24/2018 in all areas

  1. I did. Please go pester someone else now. You do realize that you are not in charge here, right?
    2 points
  2. Oh good, lets bring the existence/non-existence debate here. As if it doesn't happen on nearly every other thread already. The debate even had/has it its own thread but that is STILL not good enough. And yet the non-existence comments, while having no impact, continue nonetheless. dmaker,, instead of harping on the same thing all the time, how about coming up with some suggestions for what this thread is REALLY about instead of doing nothing but pumping everyone else for information. Saying they don't exist doesn't really excuse not bring a more positive dialogue to this topic. Opening doors to scientists is what this is about. You say they do not exist? Then I suggest start your own thread about that. Thanks
    2 points
  3. Found it...John Green's The Apes Among Us...
    2 points
  4. How do you know I don't already have it? Otherwise why would I bother. Done with you. And with the games you play.
    1 point
  5. Pester someone else? So, calling me a pest now? No one else ranks on people like you have been so consistently doing. No one. You call SWWASAS experiences that he relates here "stories". Why?? You do not believe he's telling the truth? He has brought in photos and now what? He's hoaxing? He has been consistent in his dialogue and knows and has been in the field with other researchers and they know him. But what? You don not believe his 'stories'? Why didn't you call them anecdotal evidence instead of undermining his credibility by say they are just stories? Ain't worried about me, I can handle myself. But YEESH, SWWASAS is telling stories? In other words he must be lying because you do not believe him? Or you do believe him and therefore care about what he brings here as being the truth? Because neither believing him nor disbelieving him will do. Do or don't or leave him be. Why don't you address MY 'stories' about contacting scientists? Come up with a suggestion or two? Help out? instead of whining about 'zero results' but claiming to not caring about anything- which is inconsistent. No I am not in charge....SURPISE! But then you might wish to conduct your self in a manner that respects other members? Just saying. I guess I am wondering about why perhaps you think you may have not offended anyone? You do not believe in Sasquatch. Fine. Let it go.
    1 point
  6. You make no sense. Why should you even care? If anything you say is true then you not caring is also true as you have stated that more times than I can count with respect to everything anyone says or presents about Sasquatch. Your way of getting out of an untenable argument. Again, why are you here? It makes no sense at all. Let the dancing continue. I'm actually presenting things to science and THAT is not a 'story'. I would like to run this thread on that subject. And you not caring what I want does not give you some kind of permission to not address the subject. But Nope, You want to harp on 'zero results'. You want to disrupt a thread then please take it somewhere else..
    1 point
  7. Sounds like you are assuming that the majority of the " research community " as truly capable and invested (both time and money ). The research community is far smaller than what facebook states. The majority of those claiming to be researchers are invested in tinfoil hats and are frequent visitors of the imagination station. I have talked to hundreds of people involved in this subject and I can think of maybe fifteen people that I would consider researchers, not a single one averages more than thirty waking hours a week in the forest. If you are going to come up with a reason that Bigfoot does not exist then you can't point to the funny farm and say " They have nothing ". Science has not paid it's dues on this subject and " Bigfoot Researchers " have only made the matter worse.
    1 point
  8. 12 years. And there are no shortage of amateurs like yourself out there doing the same thing for far longer. All with the same specific purpose. Zero results. How anyone can look at that and not conclude bigfoot does not exist truly, truly puzzles me. You simply cannot have droves of amateurs out combing the woods for evidence of giant monkey men in North America and have nothing to show for it. The only way that happens is if the quarry does not exist.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...