I think you misread Caenus' post. He says:
Which suggests he's not accusing BFRO of sitting on the evidence, he's talking about witnesses who sit on their own evidence and never report it.
But even if not ..
I've mentioned doing followup work for bigfoot groups, investigating reports and the like. There simply are not enough people to do the work. Opening the floodgates would be even worse because without vetting the vetters, you will have many more reports but no consistency at all in the data. You'll have one person happily certifying all the woo reports, another who won't certify anything without a body to test, and many more across the spectrum. With no filter, no matter what you put in it will be garbage out.
Moneymaker, love him or hate him, runs the BFRO with standards that would be impossible to replicate without a fair bit of control which a loose-nit group is not going to have. I'm not a fan by any means but he's earned a grudging respect from me despite some issues.
I've spent a little time in the field with some of the BFRO researchers for the OR/WA/CA area. They're pretty good folks. Volunteers, just like our SSR volunteers. You seem to expect a lot from those BFRO volunteers yet you're not contributing anything of comparable value. Perhaps you should get off your butt and go on a few of their expeditions, then maybe they'll invite you to join in the effort and you can do something of real value towards getting the information you want. You would also likely learn just what it is BFRO knows, what their motives are, and who has access to what. Rather than whining and innuendo, you might actually learn something and be able to speak truth. ... just a thought, though.
MIB