Leaderboard

For the state of Washington there is a fair portion of report data that describe white, grey and blonde individuals, I do think age rolls into the color pallet but it is not responsible for the entirety of these outstanding reports. One example that comes to mind out of my records there is a particular sasquatch ( most likely the same animal ) that has been reported over 8 times in 14 years in one particular area. This individual is blonde/tan in color and was encountered for the first time in 2003 at the standing height of about 2 feet, about 3 years later it was again seen in the same area ( within 1 mile of the original sighting ) at about 5 feet in height, in 2012 he was again spotted crossing the road about 0.8 miles from the first location and was now about 7 feet tall and thin. Over the past few years this guy has been spotted at least 3 times crossing 2 of the major highways within 12 miles of the first sighting from 2003. It is certainly an assumption that this is the same animal but the record is very straight and the coloration is not common and I certainly don't think they are as common as cows. Another example I can relate is on 2 individuals that seem to visit the Orting river valley and White river drainage as the temps drop, I get reports every late October through November of a black tall animal and a shorter tan animal moving through through the agricultural districts along power-line routes. The most interesting thing is that December hits and reports start coming out of JBLM land near the towns of Roy, Yelm and Rainer, these reports often continue until March. This is a small portion of the data I am working that so far hints on seasonal elevation movement.

Somehow based on past posts I thought you were a younger, "hip", tech-savvy person. I figured of the two of us, I'd be the one out of touch. I offer apologies for my mistaken assumption. I can't help you with the Facebook part. If you're not willing to go there, you're not going to get the information that is there. It's a choice you make. I don't like Facebook much but the info outweighs my irritation. If I do a google search on "olympic project nests" I get links to pictures and "articles". Y' have to wade through a bit of stuff but there's something to learn from even the worst of it. If I do the same in youtube I get relevant video. I'm not sure why you're not getting the same results. MIB

People often claim to see gray Bigfeet and Yeti. Most reports are brown or black. My own father claimed to encounter something large and white or gray up at his cabin at Mt. Index. It was dark and he was walking back from a buddies cabin to his own. He doesnt know what it was, and wondered if it was a mountain Goat or something else. But it was large and gray. Could these reports actually be a representation of a aging population of a cryptid primate? Humans certainly grow gray as they age? Chimps seem to as well....

NatFoot, there have been several threads about these nests right here on the forums with links to information about them. I think BobbyO has started one, I think I have started one. This thread has links to more information. The Olympic Project doesn't post information on their site or FB because they are trying to do it right. But there are information links right here about them. Most of it you are going to have to listen to podcasts.

I don't know how anyone can stand the peanut gallery that is Facebook or Twitter for that matter. BF research on FB is so painful I can't do it at all. Just too many rejects swimming those seas. Though I do agree, if you know what you are looking for and hold your nose you can make use of some info. This is the only place I am aware of where actual worthwhile BF discussion takes place, other than in person at a conference or field group. It individually which I think is best.

Thank you, gentlemen, for your help and links! I just got my Minus 33 merino wool long underwear in the mail and it's HEAVENLY. Now to work on the outer layers!

There are ways of masking your internet queries. Just make sure the company you download from is reputable. Try 1.1.1.1 from Cloudflare. Works pretty well and has no learning curve. (I don't work there btw) Here is the geekspeak: https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/dns/what-is-1.1.1.1/ as for autosaving to the cloud, just have to be wise to it. Yet something else we are opted into without consent.

Until we have the technology to have a hand held eDNA sequencer that will run the entire genome and compare it to a database then it will always come back human and will be labeled contaminated. Maybe 100-150 years from now.

Show me a pic of that area in daylight...

There are commercial quality drones that do have FLIR systems. When FLIR is mentioned I wonder if ultraviolet could be a better choice due to cost and resolution at the best visual light cameras. A FLIR system above 620P resolution is very expensive. Most normal light optical cameras can be converted to ultraviolet simply by removing a filter that filters out ultraviolet at the sensor array. Ultraviolet is considered spooky because of the images. But maybe spooky is what we want. Throw in the likelihood that BF may see into the IR part of the spectrum and I think it worth a try. If that is correct, the BF could plainly see any illuminaters and simply hide behind trees. Another factor with drones is noise. The angry beehive drone sound would get the attention of any BF. I have seem military drones that use slow speed and much quieter propellers. They put out much less noise than the hobby high speed drone propellers.

I have a particularly interesting report from a guy who said he witnessed a sasquatch digging roots out of the ground with a forked end. I think the report is legit, I will review my records and elaborate further as I can.

I believe that the laws of probability are against you. First of all, we know without doubt that both bipedal apes and large hominids have existed in the past. Secondly, we also know without question that oral, written, and glyphic human history worldwide record such creatures in our recent past. Thirdly, we have decent moving photographic evidence that they exist at least as recently as 1967. Fourthly, we have good trace evidence of their current e istence. Finally we have lots and lots of testimony of their sightings. The evidence really exceeds a reasonable doubt. Of course, it doesn’t exceed denial, but that’s okay. Frankly, I don’t care if you accept their existence or not.