Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/21/2018 in all areas

  1. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/giant-hairy-apes-in-the-north-woods-a-bigfoot-study-242257/ Extremely well written with some fascinating details for a 45+ year old article.
    2 points
  2. I have that cast in my collection. When you add contrast to the casting it shows a lot more detail. This was found by Deputy Dennis Heryford while in an area West of the Capital Forest area near Elma WA. I like this cast because it shows the phalanx areas of the foot between the interphalangeal and the metatarsophalangeal areas. It is also has depth where you expect it to have depth and a lighter imprint in the areas that are expected.
    2 points
  3. I've had a lot of success with this Kelty one man Tent. It's an easy pack in-pack out tent if hiking in or driving to some spot.
    2 points
  4. I disagree...not everything known is put out in the public.
    2 points
  5. They do appear pretty perfect and do not seem to display what I would expect toes to look like in such a robust creature, imo.
    1 point
  6. The size and shape of the delts tell me it’s plausible. If that Sasquatch rolled around in the dirt a lot and rubbed up against a lot of trees and shrubs it could conceal its smell. I think they are opurtunistic ambush predators it was lying in wait for the deer to show up and that deer in the front got to close to the game cam and set it off.
    1 point
  7. My "best" is the 1982 Grays Harbour cast that Thomas Steenburg has in his possession. It was made by a deputy sherriff answering a prowler call, and has incredible detail, including some visible dermal ridges. I'll try to find a photo to attach.
    1 point
  8. I have to go with Dr Krantz and Meldrum. The Bossburg tracks.
    1 point
  9. 1 point
  10. I am all for efforts pushing to get out and survey but you are missing the boat here. You have not elaborated on any experience you have investigating the subject, technical skills or commitment, people need to know that their investment is not some random persons vacation or summer adventure. We don't know who you are, what drives you or how much capability you have in gathering/interrupting information. You are taking the job to fill a hole, investigating in much the same way any scientist would on any other theory or study. You have to realize that people like myself are filling this same hole, I have put in hundred of nights, tens of thousands of dollars, thousands of miles to meet witnesses and collected untold amounts of ecological data from research locations. What makes someone like me want to invest in someone like you ? You need more information on yourself, goals, project structure, time commitment and expense. Just things to consider when you put yourself in this position.
    1 point
  11. Thermal imagers, trail cams, and HD cameras will not get concrete evidence. I don't have much budget for squatching. Maybe I should start begging for money too... Thing is... you don't need to have a lot of gear to see one, you just need to get to where they are.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...