Leaderboard

That’s a vacation right there! I’ll pass all day on beaches or big cities, give me remote country any day!

Another aspect of the PG film (and coverup/killing aspect) is thst the specific area of the film had a 9 year intense history of sasquatch activity before the film was shot, including hunters hired to kill a creature. Ray Wallace hired Ray Kerr and Leslie (Bob) Breazele to hunt a creature down in the fall of 1958. Not a peep from the USFS or California DFG at the time or at any time afterwards regarding this well publicized claim, even after the men claimed their own sighting and the disappearence of their hunting dogs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYyKmWndKTA

The Patterson/Gimlin event is so strong for many reasons. First, there were two eyewitnesses. Secondly, there was a very good movie film footage shot. Thirdly, there were numerous castable prints left in soft soil, which had the added benefit of having the bottom of the creatures foot shown clearly in the film footage. Finally, numerous people visited the site as soon as three days later and recorded evidence themselves of the footprints and site. One of those witnesses was an employee of the United States Forest Service, Lyle Laverty. His job as a timber cruiser put him in a position to be a point man in seeing sasquatch evidence. Sure enough, I have found reference to him finding other evidence independent to the PG event: http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/laverty.htm I have found reference to Laverty being interviewed by at least four other bigfoot researchers, but I cannot find the texts of those interviews. Mr. Laverty's involvement appears to be quite private despite his interesting position at the time of the PG event and era in northwest California from 1955-1972. Did he approach his superiors about his experiences? Was he told to keep his mouth shut? Did he pursue evidence on his own, anyway? There is evidence that he collaborated with Dahinden, at least with regard to the PG filming event. Was he quiet about it all for fear of his job security and supervisor's orders? If anyone has access to interviews of Laverty, I would love a PM. I would love to read them. I find him to be the most interesting character in the entire saga.

I don't know why this is surfacing again. This was nonsense a decade ago and still nonsense now. Bill Miller and Thomas Steenburg did a rebuttal on this a decade ago. I am surprised that it took 2 years after John Green's death for him to be attacked again

I'm still not so sure about that. Those tree hugging administrators are still under the authority of politicians who recieve campaign contributions from timber corporations, and I think government at the political and administrative level are rather satisfied with the amount of control they have over the industry. They already have near complete power, even over private corporate lands and the export of their products. But the presence of a "nation" of indigenous, primitive relic hominids goes way, way beyond timber industry concerns. It has international political ramifications that are actually quite staggering, and not just for the United States and Canada. The "concerns" about the rights, well being, and autonomy of sasquatches that a number of nations in the international community would certainly voice could present a whole host of problems..............

Hmm, what's your source for this? An outdated article from Fox news? This recent article isn't from Fox. I guess it must be fake news. "Regardless, logging in national forests is costly for taxpayers, says Hanson, who estimates they are on the hook for $1 billion a year, at least $500 million of which is directly related to post-fire salvage. That's the amount the government pays to build roads to remote areas destroyed by fires and for herbicides the forest service sprays prior to logging to make clear-cutting easier, among other costs. Meanwhile, the federal government pulls in about $150 million annually from selling the timber in national forests, about one fourth of which comes from post-fire logging. "It's a bad deal financially for taxpayers, but it's a great deal for the mills," says economist Ernie Niemi, who has studied the impact of forest management since the 1970s. "It's very hard to justify any salvage logging. It's like they're bandits." https://www.forbes.com/feature/archie-emmerson-timber-forest-fires-logging/#5f8ffbb564f9

I'm not so sure of that. If these creatures are human, I can easily see state, federal, and foreign governments going to extreme lengths covering up their existence. More interesting to me is the complete silence of the environmental industry, who have no problem manufacturing and using ridiculous fantasies like anthropogenic global warming to advance their agenda. Why are they so completely silent on sasquatchery?

This shouldn't surprise anyone who is a proponent of existence or a knower. But every time I brought it up or even hinted at it I was cast as a conspiracy theorist. It has been my contention that hit squads are out there and that it is a reason why the creatures have been moving to the more remote inaccessible reaches of the habitat. Those places too difficult or costly to harvest timber from. If any of this is anywhere near true then there may come a point where population numbers could drop below sustainable levels. Its why I have said that there are those just waiting out extinction. Hit squads may or may not exist but if they do then extinction would be almost guaranteed. There is a lot more to this scenario folks and I'm convinced it goes all the way to lab DNA, and now e-DNA, samples that consistently comes back Human and so get tossed. I still do not trust the results of the Olympic Project nest samples. There is just too much money to be made by keeping things secret. It follows the pattern of what greed has done to humanity and the planet it lives on. But hey, I always say that right? Mr. Suspicious.