Leaderboard

Logic can .. has and will again .. be wrong, be mislead by lack of a representative cross-section of information. You might say if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it must be a duck ... but what if it had other features like big floppy ears, a trunk, tusks, and lacked wings? Maybe that funny waddle and sound are completely taken out of context. The fact of the matter is, at least to the best of my knowledge, we have no evidence of a coverup. We have claims, second-hand stories, innuendo, assertion of what "must be", but not one single bit of tangible evidence for anyone to review. Less, even, than evidence of bigfoot where at least we have track casts and footprints anyone can see on the 'net or, if they make the effort, in person. We don't even have that to support the notion of conspiracy. We have nothing but BELIEFS. That's no better than the woo-bigfooters have to support their claims. I suggest that rather than trying to make a mountain out of a possibly imaginary mole-hill, we should focus on substantiating the mole-hill first. In other words, wait until the existence of this purported form is established, not just claimed, before reading stuff into it. MIB

This? thats a branch curling back up

Boats. For North and South Americas, the 'kelp highway' had food every day. Faster progress than land travel going either north or south. Don't forget the "Kuroshio" or a.k.a. "Black Current" that brings us floating debris from the Orient to the west coast. Contemporary debris from the Fukushima tsunami disaster, derelict vessels, trash can reach the west coast in a relatively short time depending on sail area. Historically, derelict vessels from China and Japan ( build type of the 'Junk' ) have drifted across the Pacific and landed on the west coast of North and South America. In the case of derelict vessels, the European way was to 'go to the long boats' and abandon ship. Oriental style was to stay with the vessel and await their fates. Regarding the ice that blocked north--south travel in the interior, I believe there is a current species that went over the barrier long before humans: raven.

A recent discovery just published about the human land bridge Bering Sea crossing has just complicated your question. The scientific dogma assumed that humans crossed that land bridge during the last ice age. But a recent study of the area showed that the bridge was not suitable for human habitation until about 12500 years ago when it finally cleared of enough ice to traverse the area. The problem with that is that humans had been in the Americas at least since 14,000 years ago and much evidence exists that they were in South America much before that. They had to made the migration before the Bering land would allow it. The only way that could have happened is using boats to move along the edge of the polar ice shield. Well similarly that would require the same migration by BF to not be possible. Especially by a giant ape from warm climated Asia. We have no indication BF ever built or used boats. They just do not seem to be capable of such complicated construction. They have ancestors someplace who died and left bones and fossils. That means that they arrived later than humans to North America to hit the 12,500 year window or they got here some other way. We have many reports of BF activity concurrent with UFO sightings. Even reports of them being beamed down from a hovering UFO to the surface. All of that hard to believe but it certainly fits my ET theory. Could they be from some planet with a dying red sun? Does that explain their ability to see in dim lighting? Sent here to primitive earth to survive as a species? After all humans and governments are happy to ignore UFO's. Why not a ET ape man? Is that why they have such a strong human avoidance protocol? Is my theory likely? No. Most likely BF is from here and somehow missing in the fossil record. Is my theory possible? Yes. Should some government admit UFOs exist, then my theory should be examined along with what is the real story of human origin.

Which I would be very eager to have a gander at. OK, but for better than fifty years at least the forestry outfits in whatever capacity or form they take have gotten reports not only from their tourist visitors but their own personnel as well. I also am under the impression that it is not confined to just the Six Rivers National Forest either. And yet there are those that say there is no cover up? Does not saying anything to the public as a policy come from up the ladder or has each state or national park head Ranger just come up with the policy on their own? And that the policy of one park or national forest just happened by coincidence to be in line with all the others? How is it then that seemingly all of the parks and national forest Rangers and managers somehow came up with the same policy unless they communicated with each other regardless of any government influence? Just because government may not be involved doesn't mean there's a new definition of cover up does it? And if that were the case and the policy of not telling the public the truth became widespread without a government mandate of some kind the government, i.e., Department of Agriculture/Department of the Interior would eventually get word that the 'local" policy was being instituted. Like I said, this discussion needs an equation or equations based on reasoning and logic. For me, that reasoning points right at "don't tell" whether it was decided by one park facility and taken up by the rest at a low-level rung of the ladder or whether the policy came from higher up the ladder. In either case, if the reports over the years are even only 10% true it still constitutes a "no-tell" policy. And that is what I would deem to be a cover up. But this thread is for sussing out, by logic, which is the only way to approach the issue, just how far up the ladder this "no-tell" thing goes. This, along with many other threads I have started, can also go under the general heading of "Solve For Bigfoot".

We know for a fact that Lyle Laverty was directly involved in the Patterson-Gimlin film event as a witness to trace evidence at the site, was among the first people in the scene after the filming event, took photos of the footprints himself, was a government official at the time, and eventually rose through the ranks of government to a near cabinet level position: http://jkagroup.com/about/lyle-laverty-bio.htm# There are also indications that Laverty had his own sighting near Hyampom, and found a nest near the PG film site at Scorpion Creek/Lonesome Ridge.

No chance it couldn’t possibly be known about.

The sure fire Maximus headlamp (1000 lumems) and the streamlight Streamlight ProTac HL5-X (3500 lumens) are great spotting lights This is 2,000 lumens on the medium setting on a Fenix flashlight (it’s high setting is 4,000 lumens and its turbo setting is 6,000 lumens) on a night hike near v rock in southern Colorado im trying to avoid Bigfoot’s by doing this i get scared

Maybe in Ohio but not in the Pacific Northwest. The trend here is for forest roads to be blocked off, abandoned, and no new roads built. Stuff stashed in the mountains and woods are very protected from intrusion by mankind. It the environmentalists had their way, the entire forest would be declared a wilderness area.