Leaderboard

The hair was tested on two different samples and came back matching other sasquatch samples that had been tested. Im not sure why. I think that since they have always been around me since I was a kid they just accept me. No clear answer for it other than im grateful for it. Thank you very much for being kind. I have q ton of pictures. Some just there heads peaking around a tree. I usually have either a digital camera . Doesn't work great or my cell ph. I dont always carry a camera. I have found if you take random pics if scenery they show up in them. If you focus on them the pics are more blurry. I also have one in the middle of cloaking. I was very hesitant to post pics here. I get tired if the ridicule. Not from here but in general. I do not try to prove anything but im happy to show what i have. People have to decide for themselves. Ive had many sightings so im happy with my own truth. Im thankful everyone is being so kind.

Well it could be that at any given time like human women of reproductive age, BF females are likely to be tending a juvenile. They don't lay eggs. One thing I have found with some people not seeing things in pictures that other people are seeing is what sort of device they are viewing it with. Often when asked they are looking on an Iphone or Ipad. Something with a small screen. I have both and can compare pictures with what I am using right now. That is a notebook computer with a 17 inch screen. There is a big difference. For some reason, the Apple products, at least the ones I have, do not deal with shadow or dark areas very well. Something readily seen with the high res larger screen of this notebook cannot be differentiated on the smaller Apple devices. When I looked at Forest Persons pictures yesterday on my IPhone I could not tell what he was seeing. Totally different on the laptop with SVGA resolution. That tends to get Apple devotees irate but like I said I have both and can compare.

You forget that they dodged out of public much like the Michigan Project when the heat got turned up and things didn't turn the way they would have preferred or *holes invaded their planning and staging areas or spilled internal strategy. It is that kind of cooperation that sinks many of these project ships. What choice do they have but go incommunicado?

Actually, I think you are a hard-charging searcher. Many of us have taken that tack, and some of us have put ourselves out there when it was needed for self-confirmation of the phenomenon. We do not all agree on the dna and the phenomenon but time spent in the woods is the way to gain personal evidence. The bully pulpit never worked for me and I didn't agree with the field and got thrown out of a BFRO invite by the chief as a result of truly relating to others what my research showed. Gained some good insight into good researchers with those contacts but didn't tuck tail and run because some pariah didn't like my experience. I don't share a ton anymore. I went your route, contacted the biologists John Bindernagel recommended to get feedback on soundtracks, etc. Got the same crickets you got; I am empathetic, but I know a trend when I see one. Nobody is going to risk their career on a phenomenon that I know of that is above the age of 35 anyway, especially if they are eyeing a pension or promotion. Of course, there are exceptions and I applaud those souls. I don't pretend to have all the answers but my answers differ from some of the better known respondents to this thread. So when somebody tells me that stick layouts that change purposefully in an overnight fashion are not trendy I say go jump in a lake, you are not close enough yet or look harder. That sort of opinion sort of cuts down on discussion now though doesn't it?

Yes and no. Currently, the avalanche danger is very high. If you want to follow the risk, we have the NW Avanche Center to scare us: https://www.nwac.us/ I do not have a snow machine. I have snowshoes. Currently, 'post holing' would make for slow progress and I have a large set for more float. The only tracks that I have seen while on snowshoes in the past were bear, deer, snow shoe hare, cougar and bobcat/lynx. Due to budget cuts, many roads are not plowed and are accessible when the snow melts. With minimum plowing, finding a place to park can be difficult. They will tow you. We are due for more snow. I may have to wait until March. Avalanche warnings have been issued late spring.

Please know im not trying to convince or prove anything . I was asked to post pics. Thank you I have others but not any clearer sorry.

There is nothing here for any of us but a bit of brainstorming. None of us can compel others to share answers, at best we can encourage them. Frankly, your apparent attempts to bully / strong-arm cooperation do more harm than good, create more barriers than they knock down. I know quite a few people in the research community, I know quite a few people who work for various natural resource management agencies. None that I know appear to have the answers, they're as in the dark as I am. They don't share because they have nothing to share. Why is that such a hard concept ... other than it isn't what you want to hear? I think you are wasting your time here. You've set an unreachable goal. If you want the results, you have to do the work. Get off the internet and go to the woods. MIB

When it comes to the ears and nose yes those can be different as well. Ive seen some with extremely flat noses as well as others who have a nose more like us. The ears vary in sizes just as with us. Im happy to speak with you about these things anytime. Just contact me . I guess you can call me a habituator . Yes they have always lived around me. I do know that like you say some dont believe it. No offense to anyone but im ok with that. I dont try to prove anything. Ive had researchers , experts all visit and they have seen what goes on. Im happy with my experiences and dont need others to believe. Yes the bigfoot are all the same species with variations. I have seen some treat different know differently due to appearance. Much like kids at school that bully others due to what they look like. All members of the family or even the clan have different looks. Yes I have pictures, hair, and foot casts. I have a baby foot cast that I have with me. My larger casts I have photos off. However when I spoke at the International scientific conference in Russia I was asked to leave casts for the Darwin museum. I also left some for a small museum run by the Shore people. So many were left in Russia. Althought i have photos of all.

I too am looking forward to getting out for a few days when it warms up. I live in Oregon. Locally a few times here in the Cascades, and then later this summer up to Mt. Hood area for a few days. I will couple squatching with a bit of treasure hunting that I like to do every year, as there is supposed to be some lost gold buried in that area. Mainly, it's an excuse for me to get out into the woods for a couple of days. 😁 I have a couple of new ideas I want to try this year regarding squatching. One thing is that I want to see if pointing a "dark" trail cam at a mirror so the "eye" is not pointed directly at the area I am interested in. I have a piece of front surface mirror in hopes that will minimize distortion of any images I might catch. If funds allow, I may set up another one in a similar manner so that it can watch the other camera in case something messes with it. Has anyone tried this or heard about it? It may have been discussed here before, but I haven't seen it because I am relatively new here.

Trying to get the others to post. Ill try again in a bit.

FWIW, here's my blobsquatch. I'm assuming that this is who/what yelled at me. Obviously I zoomed way in. It was 50 yards away, behind dense brush and bushes. I think this could be a Sasquatch because if how I got the photo (above) and I've found barefoot prints in the same area numerous times, and have found all sorts of other stuff that we generally associate with bigfoot nearby. I took it on my cell phone while walking my dog. I was not expecting anything to be there. At all! In fact, I took this pix before it yelled. After that, I hightailed it back to my truck and my only thought was to put a lot of distance between the noise maker and myself and my old dog. And, no I don't think there's anything else in this pix. We've been back there, and it's just not dense enough to hide more than one. He may even be laying down and peeping. IDK. This is why I keep going out there.