Leaderboard

99.9% of all Stick Structures are deadfall or human manipulation or snow load and equally explainable.

What's your son doing with your lady friend? Bazing! Tip the wait staff, we'll be here all week!

I saw Meldrum throwing shade on these tracks on Facebook, a few days ago. Hmm, maybe I can post it, will see.

I certainly think they are intelligent enough to use some kind of marking as a way of communication but the evidence that sasquatch actively do so is lacking in my opinion, I have yet to see a tree bend or pinning that I could not have been caused by a bear weighing down a tree to the ground and upon release getting caught under dead fall or another fallen tree. I have come across bear { and elk ) created pins, snow load pins and freak weather created " structures " on young vine maple, hemlock and even stout cedar. I have come across strange damage done to trees and young brush that I believe it was possible a sasquatch was responsible but was of no apparent direct pattern or intended significance. I have tried this method of following tree pins in an area and it does not seem to lead anywhere or provide any additional suggestive sign of sasquatch. As far as stick signs or little arrangements go, I have watched crows do some amazing things. Crows and squirrels do collect and assemble materials and objects on stumps and rocks, I have seen this first hand, they will collect shiny objects or small sticks and put them in a pile or arrangement. The squirrels do this with sticks to add materiel to the bottom of their leaf ball nests in large hemlock or oaks, I don't know why crows do this but I think it may have something to do with some degree of tool use ( they are very intelligent and do not get enough credit ). Back in the spring of 2011 I watched a crow sit on a wet rotting log using a small stout stick to pry away at the rotten fleshy wood pulp to expose small grubs or something, it was truly amazing to watch. Truth can be stranger than fiction. I don't put any stock in the stick arrangements or artful signs being left by sasquatch, as the folks who seem to call attention to this are many times fringe and not well mentally, these folks will buy into anything if it provides them any kind of confirmation of sasquatch in their backyard. I have never found such a sign or composition in relation to tracks or an experience at a location. That being said, Sasquatch do have hands, I am sure youngsters get bored and mess around with whatever " toys " they can find.

Here’s another image of the tracks they’re talking about in this article. The track line definitely looks Squathcy to me imo.. Here’s a link for this I found on Twitter- Indian Army Snow Tracks Found... Cheers!

I don't believe that. https://www.gaia.com/article/giant-skeletons-have-been-found-buried-in-mounds-across-america https://www.gaia.com/article/this-conspiracy-claims-the-smithsonian-destroys-giant-skeletons https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/graveyard-giants-found-china-180963976/ https://www.nytimes.com/1902/02/11/archives/giant-skeletons-found-archaeologists-to-send-expedition-to-explore.html Just like the homo floresiensis find was simply ignored as examples of microcephaly, and later "island dwarfing", giant skeletons are simply dismissed as giantism. Another example would be that of the discovery of the gorilla. Thomas Savage provided a skull to the Royal Geographic Society in 1847. In 1856, Paul du Chaillu emerged from the African interior with dead carcasses (not to mention claims of pygmies and ither sights that the press had a field day with). Yet American scientists and media denied it for years afterwards (consider the fact that Darwin published "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, so this was the era of huge ideological revolution). Today is no different. Mankind hasn't changed a whit. It has to be a fresh carcass, it has to be delivered, it has to be provided for free, and the source has to be willing to endure criminal prosecution for the outrageous insistence of challenging the current gods of science with proof that they have been both wrong and grossly negligent for the past century in looking into this phenomenon.

I suppose I'm a stickler for semantics. If I offer you a bubblegum wrapper as evidence of bigfoot, it is **evidence**. It may not support the case, but it has still been presented as evidence so it IS evidence. Something being evidence has nothing to do with whether it is accepted, the only thing that matters is that it was offered. What follows (acceptance or rejection) is based on analysis of the item of evidence offered. Stick structures ... in 5-1/2 decades in the woods, I've never seen one, not even in places where I've encountered bigfoot. I've seen two tree twists which I believe were caused by deep snow with an ice layer at the top creating a fulcrum about 5-1/2 feet above ground, then a snow mass sliding down that ice broke the trunk at the point where the ice fulcrum focused the force. And, of course, an epic amount of elk tree breaks, but the antler gouges through the bark are a dead giveaway. The single weird thing that makes me wonder was this. I've mentioned the ridge where the BF counted coup on me by sneaking up on me and only gave himself away by farting at an inappropriate moment. It's one of my favorite, most successful places to kill BIG blacktail bucks. Starting maybe 200 yards further down that ridge, and going for probably a half mile, one day the evergreen huckleberry bows were woven ... nonstop line down the top of the ridge. Came back 1-2 days later and there was no weaving/braiding, none. Weirdest thing I ever saw. There was no evidence I could find for what caused it and no evidence later it'd ever happened. A puzzle. MIB