Leaderboard

These 2 points of view are part of the crux of the problem in categorizing Sasquatch. The majority of Eyewitness reports are consistent with Shelly’s view, but knowers and some researchers may see JKH’s point of view because of their experiences. While I’m in synch with JKH, I’m totally glad that Shelly gives her view. We’ve seen scientists like Meldrum let their theories evolve in similar ways, from Giganto to “something else.” Details of Sasquatch behavior — that’s where we’ll learn to fine tune our answer.

I guess you missed question #3.

I can't, in good conscience, donate to the defense fund. I perceive that as promoting a kill, something I stand firmly against. MIB

That's why I think e-DNA is the best approach. It gives us a peripheral advantage that we've never had for determining the creature's existence. It's our best chance for discovery and that's where our focus and energy should be focused. I think there are citizen science programs linked into universities and F&W agencies that would allow the general public to be involved. Need to look into that aspect to be sure though.

Forgive me, but the questions seem unfair. If a person says they would not donate as a response to question one, the next question should not ask how much they would donate and not have a "0" as an option. The final question, too, there should be an option that says "I told you already, I would not donate." Sounds like the writer is assuming everyone would give money. Respectfully submitted.