Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/18/2019 in all areas

  1. Interarms was a large importer. They offered a promotion for those working behind gun counters: Sell 25 of their products (firearms), and receive free, one of their revolvers of your choice engraved with your name. I chose the. 38 Special stainless Rossi model 88.
    4 points
  2. Thanks, Georgerm, for that Smithsonian link. Would be interesting in terms of bigfoot to learn more about sandal-wearing “giants,” the 6-foot-plus individuals. If I had the time to delve into the website I sure would like to know what other bones are at the Smithsonian. Even though it looks like the Lovelock bones are not related to Bigfoot, I strongly believe that studying these archaeological mysteries brings fresh ideas and unexpected connections to the search for BF in the fossil or bone record. P.S., Northwind — gotta love those sagebrush bark Tevas in the photos from the Smithsonian!
    1 point
  3. Unlikely. There is young man on this forum, I forget his alias, a anthropology PhD candidate perhaps? He means well and has sincere interest but anyone attempting to bring BF research into mainstream academics will get slammed. It's a career killer. Even the people in labs have to be careful. The only reason Disotell participated was to shoot everything down. He never had any scientific interest in helping BF research. The fellow from U of Minnesota got a taking to after snelgrove for using lab resources (everything costs money of course). Sykes has some leeway because he is kind of a retiree at Oxford with a long history of making valid contributions. BF is a retirement focus for him. There is only one reason Meldrum has lasted as long as he has. It's because of LDS support within his University. It's not uniform. He has plenty of detractors and has not been a smooth ride for him but he never would have been able to carry on a career in BF study at another University.
    1 point
  4. DNA comparison to the Denisova Cave discovery. Now how that comparison effort was inspired, I don't know, but Homo denisova was only "discovered" in 2010. Perhaps there was "something" about the jawbone that inspired the Chinese university to compare their 1980 fossil to the Homo denisovan dna. Maybe that "something" was the magical "discovery" of the new homo species?..........
    1 point
  5. The Smithsonian has hundreds of skulls and bones from all the primates. Maybe they have Bigfoot, Yowie, Almasty, or Yeti stashed in boxes. check it out http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/3d-collection/primate/modern-human-tc-638 We need Adobe Flash Player to see the skulls. Why don't we have a bigfoot body yet. Maybe we have some bones.
    1 point
  6. Do not keep on going on and on or be naive that the Gov. and science does not have a body. Cause they do have one in their lab and might even have one that is alive. But they will deny that they do since it is only best to do so. We can question them all we want and they will deny it since this is the best course of action. After all they do not care if you do question them since they do not really have to answer to you or us any how. Unless you are in that position to know what they know then we will never know whether they have a body or a live specimen . You are either in the know crowd or you are in the out crowd. Either way the know crowd is so small that no one will never know the truth since it was made this way to prevent leaks from the inside . I am really speculating on this and the way I figure ,it would be a tight unit that accomplished this feat. This data will not be located anywhere and I mean it's DnA. I feel like the search for this creature should just be a closed case . Any DnA that gets tested will just come back with the same results that we have seen in the past. Even if you were to throw a dead body in their face it will be denied it's existence. Try proving me wrong .
    1 point
  7. Here are two more views of the same nest. Bigfoot could lay out in there. It could be a homeless shelter or a bigfoot blind or nest. It must be a bigfoot nest since it's blurry and out of focus ....a blobnest........ kind of like a blobsquatch. Why Don't We Have a Bigfoot Body Yet? To get back on the topic, we don't have a body yet for many reasons already discussed. I just heard a report from Pack West Bigfoot and a farmer with a rifle failed to shoot a bigfoot killing one of his sheep. He claimed the BF tore off the sheep's head. I've been against killing one, but this shot would be justified. I just heard another report of three bigfoots surrounding a buck, one charged, and twisted the head nearly off. Maybe people are vanishing since BF is a brutal meat eater. We don't have a body because people are soft hearted and won't shoot a human like animal.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...