Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/04/2019 in all areas

  1. Thanks for posting that Norseman. Interesting observations here...I guess today all content is marketed as "shocking", but hardly is this that, I don't think. We talk here a lot about how the enigma of the Squatch morphology and behavior lends itself to all kinds of speculation and (sometimes) dubious theories. I've proposed my share of those, and enjoy painting on this blank canvas as much as the next guy. With all due respect to Dr. Meldrum though, my reaction to this theory is pretty much a shrug. I mean, can you not cherry pick any characteristic of BF and draw conclusions about it being an ape, a hominid, an ape-hominid, a giant lemur, just about anything you'd care to propose? It might be some or none of those, for all we are able to say. That Patty has a passing similarity to an extinct precursor of H. sapiens (which they MIGHT be) is not much of a revelation, any more than saying a modern human has some similarities to a chimpanzee. After all, when your data set includes the criteria: Mammal, bipedal, binocular vision, opposable thumbs....the similarities are as plentiful as the differences. That this somehow moves the needle towards proof that Patty was an ape, and not a human? Not so much, for me.
    2 points
  2. Robustus looks like a missing link between a Gorilla and a Bigfoot! Look at the Gorilla features including a crest then the very Human looking teeth of this Biped!
    1 point
  3. From what I've Googled on the Robustus it looked like what most people describe a Bigfoot as looking like, my encounter was a moonlit night sighting so I didn't see lots of detail other that size, eyeshine, pointy gorilla type head, etc...
    1 point
  4. Thanks NorthWind! Lotta hiking this past weekend, and made it a point to check on 2 more ground hornet nests that I knew of, and sure enough, both were excavated pretty good. The arrows are pointing to items that were moved during the dig, and the rocks were big & heavy. Notice how careful and deliberate it looks, plus there were no parts of the nest anywhere around....if an animal did this, it would look totally different, and there would be pieces of the nest strewn about. Also, these 2 nests were totally off any trails, and definitely 'out there':) A few prints that were near by......one of them a double-print, as there seemed to be at least 2 of the hairymen involved. Also nearby......a very fresh Deer kill.
    1 point
  5. Welcome , lugoismad & OhioSquatch !
    1 point
  6. Truth, you are very predictable and easily baited. I have no need to out you but you answered the question precisely. You have issues, much worse than Mike P. If I was your friend I would offer to help but I'm just observing and doing my own research at your expense.
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...