Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/22/2019 in all areas

  1. I have three {3} of Rene Dahindan's Sasquatch brochures left. After these are gone, they are only in personal collections. And, these brochures, which are "Mad Magazine" humorous, rarely show for auction. I traded some things to Larry Lund, the owner of of Rene's last box, for the ones I have, maybe 10 years ago. So, if you donate $100 to the forum's fund raising, you will get a copy. Please note, I have attached these brochures to a copy of my book "The Oregon Bigfoot Highway" on an auction house for about $25 plus shipping. So, I guess I'll include a copy of the book But again, when this last one is gone, it is gone. Next, I will cancel the auction. And, if sold, I will keep the last two copies for my purposes. Joe here Oh, forgot: I'll add a signed copy of Dr. R. Jones book, Tracking the Stoneman, West Virginia's BF. Let's meet our goal. This is a great site, let's keep it that way. { In memory of Bobbie Short and her site, "Bigfoot Encounters."} Long live Dear Bobbie in the here after.
    7 points
  2. I will certainly have that conversation. Honestly, only one of them showed any interest at all in the subject. She is fascinated about the possibilities.
    1 point
  3. They are the ones conducting the experiment. If a dog ran it and dog DNA showed up it would be labeled as contaminated. IMO of course.
    1 point
  4. I don't think that is a correct analysis. Not for the person who has observed one. A person who has truly studied the evidence .. in detail .. will, without exception, conclude there is something going on worthy of further inquiry. It is circular logic, absolutely: a person who does not conclude that IS NOT, despite their possible claims to the contrary, sufficiently familiar with the evidence. The process of scientific discovery necessarily includes looking for things before we have proof they exist. Anything less requires all discoveries to be made by accident. MIB
    1 point
  5. Not at all. Just the opposite. Of course they do . That is how the unknown become known. I think you misunderstood. No argument here. I welcome the discovery of this subject. It is only my opinion that large man apes are not in the here and now. I have explained many times why it is highly unlikely the creature is roaming the forests in the here and now. Keep on keeping on . I wish you all the best in proving otherwise. Have a great safe holiday.
    0 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...