Leaderboard

NAH! You'd hate those ears

Did you see where it got so cold in Florida that the iguanas were getting lethargic due cold and falling out of the trees? The only way that round red blob in the supposed bigfoot thermal image in Expedition Bigfoot could have been a bigfoot is if they are nuclear powered. That might explain why they are so strong, fast, and don't bleed when they are shot. Not that I believe in the android theory but it is out there. Hmmm Maybe I should have a geiger counter in my field equipment list?

They have eggsacks? Reptilian? No wonder they don't show well on thermal. They assume environmental temperature.

I had no effects that I would associate with the infrasound event I experienced another time. (Buzzing pain in the gut and extreme fear. It was confusing, but I remember every second of it. I recognized it as infrasound and told the BF to quit) None of that with this voice thing. I was totally unaware of anything abnormal other than hearing the rock hitting the road behind me. But I did check the recording for ticks associated with an infrasound event. I did not see them, but even my footsteps, obscure them in a Sonic Visualizer trace. So only when I am standing still can I see infrasound ticks on the recording. Most of the time I was just walking back to my truck on the gravel road. There is a possible explanation I have not put on the table. A very strong radio signal with the voice, might have effected the audio circuits on the digital recorder and ended up on the recorder without me hearing it. That begs the question of who would have a strong radio transmitter out in the boonies close to me. Military maybe? It was in the area where I observed military helicopter operations another time. Maybe they were close and hidden and I nearly stumbled into some operation near the river and they commented I was "Too Close"?

There, fixed that for you

Welcome, Neoteny. We have quite a few members who have posted about Patty’s proportions as opposed to human proportions, and similar topics such as analyzing limb proportions of apparent hoaxes in “ape suits.” Also much comment about origins of hominids. Hope you find these postings, and enjoy.

Eggsactly.

Edumacation in an impertant theeng fur sumwon two half.

No way. In my opinion, Mountain Monsters dress a bit more dapper and snazzy!!

There's nothing wrong with where they were . It's a beautiful ranch with lots of wilderness where a Sasquatch can hide or hunt. I really didn't see an obligation of the show to even tell us they were there researching just don't fabricate stories . This show is at the same level now as Mountain Monsters

I can't accept such silliness.

I agree that it appears to be a man in a suit, but the Frreman film, with all if the backstory and the prints, far surpass this unidentified footage. Taken as a whole (which is how all evidence should be considered), the combination of evidentiary factors makes the Freeman film second only to the PG film as photographic evidence goes. The PG film is as watertight as it gets. The only way it could gave been more solid is if Patty had stopped, picked up a 150 lb stone, log, or stump, and hurled it at Patterson. And even then, we all know there would still be detractors claiming hoax.

1) Beautiful ranch. @60 square miles. It's probably better managed land than public lands, too, much like the difference between a rich man's mansion and grounds compared to public housing. I'm really glad such lands exist, and actually exist in abundance in America. It is land like this where a species like sasquatches might find top quality refuge. 2) The habitat just doesn't look like prime sasquatch habitat like a coastal rainforest probably is. If they exist there, I would highly opine that it is transitory. But what a great migratory or movement route it would be. 3) Landowners like those owning this ranch, whether a corporation or family, would have a high motive for keeping sasquatch presence secret. The very last thing such a landowner would want would be to allow government bureaucracy a toehold of authority on their lands. They have a huge investment and future to protect. 4) Considering these thoughts, I'm more interested than ever about why such landowners would allow the filming of this series on their lands. You have personal experience with this, Beans, having filmed a sasquatch hunt on a very large private land holding like this. The first big noticeable difference between your film and this one us that you filmed in the extremely difficult area of a very remote coastal rainforest. The second most notable difference is that you filmed on aboriginal lands. If you paid an access fee at all, my bet is that it was peanuts compared to what the Travel Channel paid. And the Natives have a different perspective on sasquatchery than corporate style landowners. I could go on, but my further thoughts can't compare to yours. What are your thoughts on this?

Look at the video that Norseman posted. I posted the same one in the last thread about this video. Every year this guy posts up videos "shot by other people". Every one of them is the exact same format, and almost the same length, time-wise. He's taken a bunch of them down off his Youtube channel (to make room for more, no doubt). He's the only person I know of who, when he goes out into the woods, he comes back with a Bigfoot video ... every. single. time.