Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/10/2020 in all areas

  1. i really enjoy the series these woods are haunted. seems to show real people in real events. i just wonder if some content was left out of some of the events. some of the better sightings seem to be from people that are just out for a walk in nature. i was thinking about the event where they were fishing and a huge bolder was thrown into the lake almost hitting them. if someone was to go back and see if that boulder was still there in the lake it would convince some of the non believers more. boulder that size should still be there and could be very easy to identify from other boulders that have been there for years. look forward to more sightings. DW
    1 point
  2. Most likely your novice understanding and knowledge of DNA, Genetics, or whatever does not warrant Disotell or Meldrum responding to your questions. Neither owe any explanation or reasoning to us laymen. It’s not a knock on you personally, if I personally read on the subject for sometime I wouldn’t expect to put a tenured or veteran scientist on the hot seat about BF DNA.
    1 point
  3. I've always been interested in sasquatch. I have a particular interest in general primatology, but as we all know, most of my colleagues don't dare entertain the possibility of bigfoot's existence, save for the great Jane Goodall. I won't say primatologists should have an obligation to believe or attempt to seek these wonderful creatures, but I find it hard to believe that that anyone who loves the great apes wouldn't love there to be sixth great ape species. I have no doubt that the creature Patterson-Gimlin film was the unverified nonhuman ape we call bigfoot. I've seen a lot of great evidence since 1967, but nothing that I'm as certain about as I am with Patty. It's possible Patty could have been among the last of her kind, and if that's the case and these beautiful creatures are no more, it is a shame that they have come and gone without the respect science owes them.
    1 point
  4. Breaking precedent is not easy to do in the field of science. I am going to find someone that will give me a tour of of a DNA testing lab. I am curious physically how it works and what is done to determine what species has been sequenced. My gut feeling is that there is more human involvement and subjectivity that most of us believe. It is not like you put the sample in one end and it grinds away for hours and unknown primate appears on a computer screen.
    1 point
  5. Yeah, I looked it up. It isn't the locally known starvation triangle. It's the Triangle of Missing Persons. It's really no mystery to Alaskans. It's a wilderness of remote and harsh terrain, easy to have problems in, and easy to be swallowed up in. It is incredibly easy to die up there and never be found.
    1 point
  6. But if one was in the area and it was looking to see where the cry was coming from it didn't see anything out of the ordinary . Now picture a female Sasquatch seeing this deep in a forest next to a clearing hearing the same sound . I do think some females will have a nurturing instinct .
    1 point
  7. This is a 80 pound one so if it was close to this and it left a 4" or 5 inch impression in the ground when it hit that's a big rock to throw 47 yards .
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...