Leaderboard

Here's a video showing how the Sasquatch Ontario snowprints are fake. The video also demonstrates just how easy it is to hoax snowprints. Look for the hoax indicators in all snowprints: snow piles on the edges (because the foot or hand has purposely pushed the snow to the edges to extend the print), ridges of snow at the toes (because the toes were made with fingers), other ridging of snow on the print (because fingers were used to smooth out the print). And one of the obvious indicators? Single prints (because the person making them either didn't have a lot of time to do it, like the hoaxer Dwayne S. Or because they know that they can't make duplicate rights and lefts that will match the preceding prints on the trackway). The vast majority of Sas Ontario snowprints are single prints. The few occasions where there's more than one are clearly fakes because the aforementioned hoax indicators are there and also because each subsequent right or left print are not the same as the previous right or left. They are different sizes and shapes! Don't be fooled folks! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J18RxnWlLb0

There have been posts about 'auto-target tracking' systems. The technology for the civilian security market will trickle down to us. They are working hard to eliminate the human security workers that monitor camera systems. Give your partner a break, stop eating those chili dogs when you are out in the field.

BlackRockBigfoot " I honestly don't understand the mindset necessary to discuss infrasound and 'zapping' in one sentence as an absolute given, but then to dismiss other activity as impossible in the next. Bigfoot is just an undiscovered North American ape...but self illuminating eyes, infrasound, and apparently wood ninja skills are ok." You don't know my history well enough to know my mindset. Infrasound is a given to me since I experienced and have recorded it. It is not woo when you can record and analyze it. There is an entire thread in the archives about my experience with that. How do you know it is just an ape? Without DNA you don't know what it is. How many apes have verbal language? Myself and others have heard them talk. If it is an ape it is the first to have a spoken language. They are wood ninjas. They have survived thousands of years hiding from us and become very good at it. What is magic about that? I have not observed self illuminating eyes. That may or may not be real but I do not know what the mechanism would be to create that. An eye generating its own light would be blinding to the creature that had it. Anyone that has had their eyes checked where the doctor shines a light inside you eyes knows how blinding it is. I suspect most of what people are seeing is retinal reflection of a light source the viewer was not aware was present. I have seen people publish pictures of purported self illuminated eyes then admit when questioned that there was a fire burning behind them when the picture was taken or were likely unaware a buddy was behind them shining a flash light towards a noise in the woods or that the moon was behind them. Humans are rarely anywhere in the woods at night without a source of light. Many of the woo woo claims are not repeatable or seen with others present and like bigfoot himself seem to defy being photographed. I will entertain anything as possible if someone can provide a good argument how it is possible. I am expected by some to believe a physical biological 9 foot creature can dematerialize and go to another dimension. Science has never observed anything, even at the atomic level, going to another dimension. If you or anyone else wants to give bigfoot demigod status and powers you are certainly welcome to do that. But you have created another religion by doing that.

Does not matter if it is bear claw. Bears do not use sticks to dip for termites that I know of. It was likely the bears interest that got the BF interested in dipping. Bears commonly tear rotting logs apart to get their termites. Sadly that find was several years ago (Jan 22, 2016) before the area went inactive due to clear cutting. However as I mentioned that behavior of using sticks to dip for termites is likely common where BF is present. I saw that, took the picture, and a few visits later got zapped at the location so forgot all about the stick find until reminded by the chimpanzee study. As I said before I would have no idea where to likely find DNA. But seeing this and knowing about the chimpanzee study, I know know exactly what to look for. I will put together a DNA sample kit using the protocols in the chimpanzee study to minimize the chance of contamination with my own DNA. ( I just had a chuckle writing this. Should my DNA contaminate the sample they will be scratching their heads as to how my 3 percent Neanderthal DNA got into the Pacific Northwest woods. As strange as science is about bigfoot they would more likely decide that Neanderthal is roaming the Pacific Northwest than bigfoot is.) This is a description of the collection protocols from the Chimpanzee study: "Thirty termite mounds were monitored three to four times weekly for chimpanzee activity. All new termite-fishing probes that were abandoned in situ where they had been inserted into a mound were collected for DNA analyses. Each tool was collected using a new pair of gloves. A 5 cm segment of the end of the tool that was inserted for fishing was cut using scissors sterilized with bleach and ethanol between each use and preserved in 5 ml of RNA later (Life Technologies). Faecal samples were collected from within the Issa chimpanzee study area between 2009 and 2012. They were collected from trails when tracking chimpanzee parties, or from beneath chimpanzee night nests, and preserved in an equal volume of RNAlater. All samples were kept frozen at -18°C on site in a solar powered DC freezer (Model number ARB, 47L), before shipment at room temperature. Termite tools were shipped to the University of Cambridge in January 2015 and stored at -20°C, whilst chimpanzee faeces were shipped several times yearly to the University of Pennsylvania and stored at -80°C." Looks like I am going to have to get a little freezer. RNA later is available from the manufacturer. Looks like anyone that intends to take DNA samples should have some on hand. Invitrogen RNAlater Stabilization Solution is an aqueous, nontoxic tissue storage reagent that rapidly permeates tissues to stabilize and protect cellular RNA. RNAlater solution minimizes the need to immediately process tissue samples or to freeze samples in liquid nitrogen for later processing. Tissue pieces can be harvested and submerged in RNAlater solution for storage without jeopardizing the quality or quantity of RNA obtained after subsequent RNA isolation.

I don't know alot about Scott other than he was team Paulides and Bobby Short early on with emphasis on East Tennessee/Smokies. I was not aware of his leaning toward the demonic influence end of things. I am not going to disagree as I feel like it is a natural culmination of the research that many people seem to acknowledge if not angelic or EBE.

They have been "found & studied", but the findings have been ridiculed, labeled "too much woo", rejected, & swept under the rug. The people who "found" it are labeled as hoaxers, incompetent, and/or lunatics, then it's back to "Why can't we find them?" There's an ELEPHANT in the room! Why can't it be seen? I think that the majority of us haven't been ready to see, but it seems that as the "veil" gets thinner, the blurry Sasquatch is becoming more clear. Maybe "discovery" is closer than we think. The findings are beginning to be taken a little more seriously, even though the woo is still there. Soon, maybe the woo will be recognized as merely better use of the brain..... Here's a good video in which Dr. Igor Burtsev shares some of his recent findings from the US. There's also some discussion about the Ketchum study. I found it very much worth watching.

Agreed, but since I've gotten past the "prove it" mentality, good photographic and trace evidence excites me. Something like the Bossburg prints or that recent Calgary family video along the river are fine for me.

You know what the number one non fictional cable show is? It is "Oak Island." On history channel. The watchers are people like me who know the history and follow the present exploration. I read an account of the exploration of the island in Readers Digest when I was a young teen. It is not anything of interest to a casual viewer. But the show is rewriting the history of North America. Evidence found recently is pointing to activity on the Island by Knights Templar long before the voyage of Columbus. With all its faults, "Finding Bigfoot" had a lot of bigfooters as watchers who watched week to week because people like me know some of the screen characters. Most of us did not agree with the methods and were very vocal about it. But we watched just the same. It is those regular watchers like with Oak Island that keep up ratings. The casual flip through the listing viewer does little for ratings. The Expedition Bigfoot show was transparently fake to most of us who watched. I doubt there is a core of watchers who would keep it on the air.. They had their shot and blew it.

I think "shooting" a Sasquatch is like "climbing" a mountain. It describes only the easier half of the job. His stance on the topic tells me he appreciates that. When a man who puts people on grizzlies and moose to shoot them tells you "Uh-Uh", that speaks volumes to me, I don't know about you. I am kindly taken aback by him roundly trashing a lot of the better known researchers, although I think he hits it on the head when he calls many of them entertainers. There is a lot of that always happening; The Bigfootery Circus, of course. I can see how one who has enough personal field experience with the animal would want to just say, "Enough already!"

Which is a great cop out and coincides nicely with the “I don’t have to prove anything to you....just trust me” line of BS. And I cannot find any evidence of one, let alone 3-4!

I might believe 10th season since 100th season would predate television by a long time.

He has said in his video that if he did ever try to shoot one of these creatures. That he would never make it back to his truck alive. This only says what a lot of us have said that these creatures never travel alone. Where you see one there are two or three around some where near. We just do not see those others that are around. Yes. it is true that he does not have no interest of pursuing these creatures.