Leaderboard

Of course the difference could also be in your comfort zone and how you interact with each of the different groups

Well they can tell a dog's breed by DNA testing, so it does go below the species level

Hey, you're pretty fast here, bud I corrected my error but you were faster.

Sykes says otherwise with reference to Zana.

That imaginary fence is called “habitat” in biology..... Grizzly bears like more open habitat. Black bears prefer dense forests.

Boiled down to brass tacks. From the Mule foal article. Mules are a hybrid of two species – a female horse and a male donkey – so they end up with an odd number of chromosomes. A horse has 64 chromosomes and a donkey has 62. A mule inherits 63. An even number of chromosomes is needed to divide into pairs and reproduce.

No Y chromosome of the Neanderthal species remains.....and yet we interbred with them. Why? Its the same reason you cannot breed Ligers or Mules. They are a sterile hybrid. A tiger and a lion are not the same species. But can breed and produce sterile offspring. Same goes for the coupling of a horse and a donkey. Except in very rare cases. https://www.habitatforhorses.org/time-for-a-double-take-a-mules-foal/ It would seem that Sapien-Neanderthal female hybrids could have offspring (or at least some of them), but male hybrids were sterile. Which means that we were not the same species of human. What number of percentage is that gap? Of that I’m not sure.

No. No it wasnt..... Grizzly bears were never found on the east coast.

That would explain some of the bottom feeders in our society.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species So, creating a species can be done in many ways, and apparently is made lasting by consensus. Other than the examples I used above with various human ethnicities and the hippos, polar and brown bears can be cited (prizzlies). Even among brown bears are such sub-species as European brown bears, grizzly bears, Kodiak bears, and others. With domestic dogs, we have breeds as varied as St. Bernards and chihuahuas, all the same species despite every difference imaginable except interbreeding capabilities. "Science" by consensus. So Neanderthals, now recognized as having bred with homo sapiens "in the wild", are different than homo sapiens.........well, how? Exactly?

The two stones I found sitting on a downed tree right after a very clear rock clack were about the same size. The clacking came 15 minutes after a double wood knock, (as in knock, knock), and that one fifteen minutes after the first double knock. All three incidents were getting closer to us each time. So knock, knock. 15 minutes. Knock, knock, 15 minutes (sticks popping). Rock clack (clack clack).Then I walked toward the sound. Photo posted in the Lane County Bigfooters section. I think these were used for signalling. I imagine if one were trying to take out a deer, a rock the size of a cantaloupe would be a very effective weapon hurled with force and accuracy, especially in a crossfire. And I think they are more than capable of doing just that.

Not sure why I got a downvote. It’s a statistical fact. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States According to the US Department of Justice, African Americans accounted for 52.5% of all homicide offenders from 1980 to 2008, with Whites 45.3% and "Other" 2.2%. The offending rate for African Americans was almost 8 times higher than Whites, and the victim rate 6 times higher. Most homicides were intraracial, with 84% of White victims killed by Whites, and 93% of African American victims were killed by African Americans.[49][50][51] In 2013, African Americans accounted for 52.2% of all murder arrests, with Whites 45.3% and Asians/Native Americans 2.5%. Of the above, 21.7% were Hispanic.[52][53] Blacks account for the majority of gun homicide victims/arrestees in the US while Whites account for the vast majority of non-gun homicide victims/arrestees. Of the gun murder victims in the United States between 2007–2016, 57% were black, 40.6% white (including Hispanic), 1.35% Asian, 0.98% unknown race and 0.48% Native American. Non-gun homicides represented about 30% of total murders in the time period. Blacks were still overrepresented although only by about 2.5x their share of the general population.[54] Of the non-gun murder victims in the United States between 2007–2016, 61.5% were white (including Hispanic), 32.9% black, 2.29% Asian, 1.89% unknown race and 1.43% Native American.[55] ————————————————————————————————————————- Anyhow I don’t think much of it has anything to do with genetics......Neanderthal or otherwise.

Hi, Mississippian. I am from Mississippi also. I have encountered the hairy people from time to time but not recently.

Sometimes a dog bark is just a dog bark (with apologies to Freud :)) but if bigfoots are as good at mimicking various animals as lore suggests, then a bark being in their repertoire is a given. The question becomes one of absolutely eliminating regular dogs as the source of what you heard as well as eliminating all "normal" animal possibilities. Note that bears can give a sort of bark or woof/huff, but that's unlikely if it was coming from many locations since bears are not pack/herd animals. Elk will also "bark" .. and as I imagine the setting described, I think that is a real serious possibility. MIB

Well, I can't cover all arguments in one post now can I.