Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/14/2020 in all areas
-
I"ll call you out on that. Throwing 130 yards? Sure!!!. The longest recorded throw for a baseball player is 445'10"or almost 149 yards. So your saying you are only about 19 yards short of the longest professional throw ever? Get out of here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glen_Gorbous A pitcher who throws at 90mph is going to throw the ball about 100 yards or 300 feet. You were hitting an 8"x8" target at 100 yards with random rocks you picked up?? Really??? https://www.quora.com/How-far-can-a-professional-baseball-player-throw-a-baseball IB4 you could have played pro ball as a child. I bet you also could hold all the world records for largest fish caught if you ever decided to turn in your your catches.2 points
-
That imaginary fence is called “habitat” in biology..... Grizzly bears like more open habitat. Black bears prefer dense forests.2 points
-
I looked around & couldn't find this posted anywhere. If this isn't where it belongs, please move it to the proper place. I find it very interesting. Vhttps://scenicsasquatch.com/2019/01/04/researcher-mk-davis-exposes-the-cover-up-and-covert-genocide-against-sasquatch/?fbclid=IwAR11oPvqXBkVIlugcLe-qBAmQCzOZ-Wid9l_ggIXfdCOdiLWP_-HUyJhUA01 point
-
I know I couldn’t throw a rock 100 yards and I’m sure I’d strain something trying!! It’s not an easy feat hence why I doubt the average person can. Happy to eat crow if proven wrong by either of them. I’d gladly pay their premium membership for a year and give them props.1 point
-
Outfielders not only can they throw it 100 yards, but do it accurately.1 point
-
1 point
-
If human prehistory is like human early written history, most sex between different factions was likely not voluntary. That probably enabled genetic diversity and made mankind more robust as a species. Probably a good thing humans are sexually not as coy as giant pandas or we would be in the same trouble they are facing extinction.1 point
-
Well then, here's your chance to call me a liar. See, growing up where I did, throwing rocks is what we did. We'd go down to the river, to a gravel bar with a plethora of rocks of every size and shape, throw something in the water as a target, and try to pound it. I remember tossing an 8 inch by 8 inch piece of old plywood into the river and hitting it with 2 consecutive throws beyond 100 yards. The location was where I had my first sighting and we were throwing beyond where the bigfoot passed us which I'd guestimate at 75-80 yards. The very edge of my range was 130 yards, measured, where a boulder stuck out of the current. When I was .. probably 9 or 10 .. my great grandfather's cocker spaniel was out on the lawn with us kids. We always had a bunch of deer around. One of the old does took exception to the dog and went after him. I couldn't get in the way in time so I grabbed the nearest handy thing, a chunk of broken concrete a little smaller than a softball, and I gave it my best heave. She was 25 to 30 yards away. I hit that deer in the head with that chunk and it made a sick crunchy sound like small bone being crushed. She hit the ground with her chest and head while her back end was still up. She pushed herself in a circle a few times trying to get back up .. partially paralyzed. She eventually got up and shook it off but it wouldn't have been any big thing to go over and finish her off. Another time a few years later I did the same thing only with a green walnut, husk and all. It exploded on impact. Little buck went end over end. He got up quicker, but the accuracy and the power were there, just wasn't a solid enough object that I'd thrown to kill him. Bigfoot doing it? Yeah. If their hands are shaped right for throwing, it's a pretty safe bet. You're ridiculing something you're wrong about. Not good. MIB1 point
-
Human history is a hot mess. We didn’t just eat everything we came in contact with.......1 point
-
And interbred with us, too: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg24031992-600-traces-of-mystery-ancient-humans-found-lurking-in-our-genomes/1 point
-
Has anyone here ever watched a baseball game? Do you know how hard it is to throw a rock/ball at force and distance? Even professionals have a hard time hitting an imaginary strike zone...but you want me to believe that BF hunt with rocks smaller than a baseball but bigger than a gollfball? Think about what you're saying for God's sake. This is ludicrous.1 point
-
Norse...I have the perfect smartphone holder for your Emerson chest pack. It can fold away when not in use and allows hands-free use of your phone. I'm going to get one and will use it when I'm scouting around the woods and bushwhacking. When I want to follow a track on my topo map, my hands will be free. There is the original Juggernaut holder for the IMPCT case for your phone and there is the FMA version of it that is a fraction of the cost. If your phone fits one of cases, it is worth considering. I ordered the Juggernaut IMPCT case and will get PALS Armor mount. Juggernaut cases and molle-case holder mount: https://shop.juggernautcase.com/categories/mounts-accys-apparel/smartphone-mounts.html FMA version (much less expensive): https://www.fma-tactical-gear.com/collections/tb-fma-1/tactical-phone-case1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I do agree that some of these cases are strange and do have odd circumstances attached to them, and if a particular case (s) peak your interest, then you should try an find multiple sources for information I would think.1 point
-
No Y chromosome of the Neanderthal species remains.....and yet we interbred with them. Why? Its the same reason you cannot breed Ligers or Mules. They are a sterile hybrid. A tiger and a lion are not the same species. But can breed and produce sterile offspring. Same goes for the coupling of a horse and a donkey. Except in very rare cases. https://www.habitatforhorses.org/time-for-a-double-take-a-mules-foal/ It would seem that Sapien-Neanderthal female hybrids could have offspring (or at least some of them), but male hybrids were sterile. Which means that we were not the same species of human. What number of percentage is that gap? Of that I’m not sure.1 point
-
1 point
-
@hiflier I'm not the one that down voted you but I"m guessing its because you came off a bit critical. He's out there hiking the woods and documenting what he finds. My opinion on his nest find aside, he's out there presenting his opinion and his finds via video which is better than most. You seem to come off as saying because he has been doing this for X years but not getting science involved is a bit preachy. Especially considering most BF'ers always tote the "I"m not trying to prove it to anyone else" line. He's out there doing his thing and presenting his findings. He's not bringing science into it but he is not required to do so, your post could give the impression he owes something to science or the field. Just my thoughts, not saying it was your message.1 point
-
So, FelixTheCat, this has been educational to be sure. There is a dynamic that maybe you could go into a little regarding your own viewpoint on suspected Sasquatch nesting behavior. Off the bat, do you think that the supposed Sasquatch nesting sites found in the Olympic Peninsula, May of 2015, would be more in keeping with what the creatures might construct. Those nests were compared to the nesting behavior of Western Lowland Gorillas which primitively weave twigs into a structure almost on a daily basis. One question would be have you noticed any nesting behavior more sophisticated that what you have found and shown on your videos? Another question would be do you think that nesting behavior found in one region would be different than behavior in another region and why? A third is, if these nests areas that you find are so close to trails and, IMHO, not the least bit elaborate, then they are made quickly and not meant for long term use? That said, their location close to trails, even though not obvious, should afford an opportunity to collect hair samples or fecal material? And lastly, Have you thought of contacting any wildlife experts, or biologists, from a nearby academic institution to perhaps give an opinion or take a soil sample from in or around the nests? You say you've been dealing with this for years with different types of experience and encounters so I get the impression that you may just keep on for years without a solid piece of evidence for this creatures existence. Do you think it may be time to see if some solid evidence could be acquired by a specialist in the field of wildlife behavior familiar with the area, or a geneticist who might be curious about the structures and what/who may have made them. I say all of this because you have been urging people to go out this Spring and find some nest sites of their own but ultimately how would this progress the subject any further what what you have already done? I mean, I give you kudos for finding these and investigating the possibilities so don't get me wrong. However, I also think it's time to go further and not stop short by finding a nest site, videoing it, and more or less just leave it t that. Do you think it's time to get some science involved in order to gain a definitive answer beyond you yourself being satisfied with who/what is making these structure?1 point
-
This was very interesting to read as well as watch the video. If proven true its terribly sad. First the fact that so many were killed and second the cover up that followed. M.k. is well respected and has always been credible. Now to learn that high profile researchers were involved is beyond troubling. This one is heartbreaking on many levels.1 point
-
I cant. I was just shopping on amazon and this bag was half as much. So I pulled the trigger... Be nice...or I’ll hit you with it.1 point
-
Can you point out for us the page number in the "Official Bigfoot Discussion Handbook" where it explains the difference between "special knowledge" and "regular knowledge". Some people might want to avoid discussing "special knowledge" in an effort to keep the peace.1 point
-
Yeah, I'm sure they stayed behind that imaginary fence... same way they keep changing the dates of how long native americans were in North America, I know it's been pushed back thousands of years from what it says in my elementary school history books. No doubt Europe was covered in big animals like Africa and they hunted them to Extinction... Maybe the "Great Replacement" is Karma... what comes around goes around!!-1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00