Leaderboard

Rabbits are not the only small animal at risk in the toilet paper crisis. My neighbor sent me this link and I could not see a squirrel for days without laughing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-Gly0No_P0

Regarding the location and algorithm stuff, there's a few things. 1) If they were telling the truth about where the series was filmed via that map at the start of the program (was it maybe on episode 1 or all, I can't remember), then the reports they were using weren't public as that area has little if any worthwhile history of reports and therefore must have been private, in which case an algorithm in the grand sense of the word isn't needed at all as the data would be so small and using the word would be a little deceiving. 2) The map which I talk about that was shown, wasn't the real location that the series was shot in and therefore they lied about it, and therefore i'd then assume probably correctly that they lied about other things, including having some kind of magical algorithm. 3) Anyone with even the slightest hint of interest on public BF Report algorithms and databases knows there's only one out there worth its salt, and it lives right here on this very forum.

This show was filled with lies from start to finish. They could have told the truth for all the reasons you listed, and we'd be fine with it, but they went out of their way to deceive. I have no doubt the cast members have sincere interest, but lying will not make them friends in the BF community. This was a silly tv show and not a serious bigfoot investigation. I forgive Bob Gimlin for his participation. I hope he got a nice paycheck. You should read the whole thread. It's probably more entertaining than the actual show.

One factor that I do not believe anyone has mentioned during this discussion, but Paulides’ first three books, along with his nabigfootsearch website is dedicated to Bigfoot. I think to say that he doesn’t want to claim to know what events are happening to be a little misleading. Would you have an entire website about a subject, dedicate your career to “it” if you felt it was something else besides the subject you were writing about and sharing about on your website? Just my opinion, hope everyone is staying safe, Joseph

Would love to hear that story sometime @coffeepot65 welcome to the best bigfootforum on the web!

Let's hear it for our amazing Curator, Redbone, and everyone else who worked, and works, so diligently on our SSR!

You should sell them that story! “There I was 44 feet down in the murky deeps..... thought I was gonna die! But that Life proof case saved my durn phone! Came out of that frozen Alaskan lake as dry as a Mojave wind! I KNOW if I bought the cheaper case.... my phone would have died right there with my pickup at the bottom of that lake!” Thats gotta be worth something!

Very neat videos!

Reindeer antler. It's from Knives of the North, the Erapuu Puukko. Blade is 4 1/2 inches. I also have a bigger knife from them, but it's huge and I have small hands. I bought it so I could process wood, but i guess I'll use my saw or axe, and use this smaller knife for daily hiking use.

Walking around carrying a rock for throwing could suggest premeditated thought. Even if not walking around carrying one or two, the simple act of reaching down to pick up one says a lot. So, hunger? Distraction? Intimidation? No matter the reason there must be a level of training and experience behind such a maneuver- especially when performed silently until the rock strikes something. We talk a lot about this rock throwing stuff but it really does show more to us than just the simple act a tossing an object. It's something we kind of take for granted when actually the phenomenon should almost register shock. Like watching Patty walk across the screen. It makes me think we've hardened ourselves to the impact of what these things truly mean. To put it in perspective, there SHOULD NOT BE a Patty, and there SHOULD NOT BE rock throwing- except by Humans. The ramifications of such things get softened with time and dialogue and we lose the significance of what we discuss. Keeping it green isn't easy, but every now and then, assessing the magnitude of what it is we are talking about is an important review lesson for all of us. Walking around on two legs and rock-throwing by something that isn't a Homo sapiens sapiens is an extremely, highly serious, phenomenon.

You're making straw man arguments. My issue with Expedition Bigfoot has nothing to do with their P & L statement and everything to do with the consistant misrepresentation and outright hoaxing upon which the production was built. As far as I can tell, you're the only one bringing up Missing 411; if you really want to compare it with other reality TV productions, look no further than Josh Gates' current shows "Expedition Unknown" and "Expedition X" as well as the discontinued "Destination Truth". Those all have great production values, go where they say they will and don't need to insert fake drama to keep viewer's attention because there is real action and drama aplenty. When you've watched Josh and crew following a bi-pedal trackway through knee deep snow on a mountain side in Bhutan at night in a blizzard only to break off because a wolf pack is approaching, the phony maudlin dreck of Expedition Bigfoot isn't even good soap opera.

Anybody know if the Bigfoot conference the Expedition Bigfoot screen characters were supposed to appear at happened? Or did it get cancelled because of the COVID-19 thing? From what I heard they were going to be ambushed at the conference by people who checked into the facts behind the show. Might be lucky for them if the Conference was cancelled. Save them a lot of embarrassment.

This is the only one of his videos I watched completely, and it will be the last I bother with.

Great vids, thanks for sharing Norse..;)

I first had a Lifeproof case for my first Iphone. That was tge case that my phone was in when I drove to the bottom of Big Lake through the ice.......44' down. I was down there for at least a minute, too, and remained in the water at the surface for another several minutes. The phone was in my pocket, and was completely fine. But it was brand new, purchased and installed the night before. I had a few Lifeproof cases afterwards for my phones, and I found that they don't last over a year. My only other problem with them is that they muffle my speech into the phone, but seem to work fine in speaker mode. Hearing through them at the ear is also muffled. So this last phone git a Pelican case. This case is much more sturdy. I've had it for almost two years now and it looks and appears as bulletproof as the day I got it. But it still muffles my voice as I speak. I hear fine with the phone at my ear, and speaker mode is flawless.

Everything on a BF forum is a strawman argument. That sounds like Peter Byrne talking!