Leaderboard

Seems like something silly to get worked up about. Why do you think there are no articles on the subject?

The thing about those down votes is that it makes you want to shove it down their throats even more. It is not about hate but it is about them not liking the argument. Sure there is a lot that can be done with E-Dna . But the problem is that it might not be effective in the search for this creature. It might show that this creature might have been in an area at a given time. But it is not going to give much details after that since there is that chance of contamination of human presence and that creates the problem. About the only way that it could work would a on site sighting and collecting the E-DnA after the sighting. Once that is established then it would have to be done again so that the species could be properly identified. Two different sightings on two different occasions with fresh E-DnA samples. This way it could be compared between the two to get the proper data to have the right sequence. This would then be entered into the gene bank so that it could be compared with other DNA sequences. Again I am just speculating my opinion. But this might have already have been done and no one wants to speak up about it . Since this might change the way we think about our selves. I mean can you imagine if people knew how life was created . This would change the way we believe. I am not sure that anyone is ready for that change. Just the way I am talking goes against what we were taught . It would be like what those felt in science back in the 1600 - 1700 hundreds. They went against the church and were called heretics. My sighting made feel like I was cursed . I felt exactly like heretic since it went against what I believed. All I have is the love of my family, which is my wife and kids. There is no normal life.

Keep those downvotes acomin' folks. They actually make me smile a lot. So, what about Sasquatch vs. e-DNA vs. the internet?

It's always silly in my case NatFoot, you know that Go ahead, find a link for me that currently mentions Sasquatch and e-DNA in the same breath. The easy way around that is to simply say you don't care. If that's the case I might be interested in knowing why you wouldn't be. I mean many are here waiting for someone to bring in something tasty to hash over and talk about. I would think no one on the internet talking currently about using the e-DNA science in the overall hunt for Sasquatch would be pretty interesting reading. I bring it up, it's not interesting. Someone we don't know and it becomes interesting and lively discussion ensues. I think hunting for Sasquatch in the field with e-DNA, and not just on a nest structure, would be good enough. I mean if it's good enough for ma nest structure it's good enough to deploy anywhere. But no one's talking about using that technology. At least none that I can find. It just seems odd considering e-DNA is used to single out wolverines and other creatures. So it's not like it's bogus, and undependable science. Sasquatch DNA isn't in the GenBank. So what. Someone can fairly easily get around that. But apparently no one on the entire internet, including a massive pile of BF researchers, ever mentions anything about it. Yep, if anything seems silly, it is that. Of course, only someone who's interested, and all serious Bigfoot researchers should be, would notice that there's a huge e-DNA elephant missing from the research equation.

Downvote Someone's got thin skin Guess that easier to do than to show me something on the internet that says I'm wrong.