Leaderboard

Race/tribalism is among the most charged human issues in world history. Its ramifications go back to before recorded human history. Indeed, it already includes the past existence of sasquatches, whether or not they still currently exist, just like it did that of Neanderthals, Denisovans Hobbits, and all other human species. Extending race today to include other human species complicates the issue further in every way. On a world scale, it brings new meaning to the concept of "basic human rights". Recognizing that makes "discovery" among the most important human realizations in human history, on scale with landing on the moon and developing nuclear weapons. It changes everything, and for all time. If sasquatches still exist, it is unfathomable to imagine that modern governments of nations like the United States, Canada, Russia, India, and China are not aware of it. Thus, if you believe that sasquatches currently exist, you are eventually forced to face and strongly consider that logical deduction. Currently in North America, sasquatchery is dealt with very differently by the different levels of government. Local governments (county and city) tend to support sasquatchery in a carnival/festival spirit, and a little money is made. But there's more; local law enforcement (sheriff's, deputies, and city police) have a long history of official investigations, collection of evidence, and documenting reports, including their own sightings. Immediately upon graduating from local to state/national government, which would be the levels of government which would politically negotiate and administer treaties with aboriginal peoples or administer an endangered species protection act over large areas of public lands, the entire atmosphere changes completely. Now a sasquatch researcher or citizen reporting an encounter faces quiet denial, condescension, or complete silence. No records of any kind are taken, maintained, or available for review. This is even dramatically different than in UFOlogy, which has seen hundreds of millions of public dollars spent by both the military and NASA in both responding to UFO reports and even scientific Searches for Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Further, the acknowledgement of, negotiations with, and treaties with another human species would necessarily have to be an international effort, especially since these creatures appear to live in more than one nation. Moreover, the entire world government (United Nations) would be involved, not just those nations in which these primitive humans live. Their "basic human rights" would have to include emigration/immigration, among all other considerations. So, it appears undeniable that IF sasquatches currently exist (or even existed in the recent century, but are now extinct), government is not particularly interested in discovery, and is likely discouraging discovery. If true, is it wise to blindly attempt to achieve discovery? Will you be effectively blocked? Persecuted? Silenced?

Well, I don't mind telling you a very close approximation of the nests, but what I don't want is a bunch of yahoos showing up with guns, and making bigfoot calls like on T.V. and wood knocking and call blasting. In my opinion, those actions don't fool the forest people, you are only fooling yourself. Its not that I don't want to share, I don't want them moving out, because of excess human pressure. But in truth, if the area was overrun by people, I could find another area within a few miles and be just as successful. In fact, I know of at least 4 areas nearby, that I have researched, and they are there, in my opinion, they are everywhere, I would bet there exist a minimum of 1000 in Massachusetts. If you lived near northern Worcester county in Massachusetts, I would invite you to see. That is an open invitation to you and any of your members that I think would respect the area and its inhabitants. And what elevation, the highest ground of course. They seem to prefer the high ground, conventional historic wisdom combined with my own experiences. Why? Because most people are too lazy to hike up a hill and that's the truth. They are not always on the high ground, but they will be where people seldom visit. At night, with full leaf cover, they'll come down and roam just about anywhere, including people's backyards. Then before 4 am, approximately, they'll gradually retreat back up the hill. And during winter, with snow on the ground, they are strictly on top of the hills, in their secret hiding spot. Rule #1 for them is leave no trace. But I'm sure you may have heard all this before. My house is a few miles south. My house is 1050 feet above sea level. My favorite hill for interaction is 1350 feet above see level. My friend, Lady in Waiting, rest her soul, would spend the nights alone, and she told me they get active around 10PM. I prefer daytime excursions, and they will interact with me until about 10AM. These are not hard and fast rules, but are generally correct, with exceptions of their own making. If you google "eastern hemlock range", that is the area that I would expect to find these nests. If it is raining, I get no interaction, they hunker down just like the other animals. If it rained the night before, the forest floor will be quiet, and sometimes I'll surprise them and they'll start rock clacking, dead giveaway that its them. They are not omnipotent, and although they fear man just as all the other animals do, they are curious and just can't help but follow you and observe you. That is, if you get to the woods before other people, otherwise obviously, they'll be following those people. I like to get there before 7AM, or even earlier sometimes. Thanks for your well wishes. FTC