Leaderboard

Are you not then favoring what expedition Bigfoot did with their so called advance data algorithm. Like a complete data analysis of all the sightings and then coming down to a prediction to a predetermined area. Which I feel that is very meaning less. You can take a plane in a given area and place it in a glide with a thermos and the maybe be able to find a place that they might be. Mark that area and hike in silently and hope to be able to get video of your find. But good luck with that. It is either they are going to find you or you are going to run into them by accident. . If they were so easy to predict their movement there would be a conversation that we are having right now. This discussion would be done with. Like I have said in my previous thread . we have been doing this since the 50's and have tried everything that could have been tried. Nothing to this day has brought nothing that proves these creatures exist as an actual flesh and blood. Yet the math does not lie that they do not exist. The accounts can account for that. The truth is there in peoples faces but refuse to accept it. The problem is that there might not be that many. The few that there are just wonder from one place to anther,. Nomadic yes but few. Staying hidden in from us. They choose who they want to respond to. If they become aggressive then you have to think that they might not have a choice. You have to imagine how we would be if our survival was at stake how we would be. I can say one thing if my life was at stake I be doing what ever it takes to stay alive. We have a brain so we have understanding . So if they are part human then they must have some understanding of them selves. You few can shun me but I really do not care. I know what I have encountered and I know people who have encountered the same that I have. I am still going to speak out. My word means just as much as any ones else word does. I will not back off. I do not need a tarpit to deal with what I believe in and have encountered. No opinion just fact.

Sometimes a push might work like you do when hunting deer. Where you have hunters sitting in a certain spot and you have other hunters pushing those deer towards those sitting hunters. Now I am assuming on my part but this just might be dangerous with these creatures.. My take is more of the old school style of research in where you have them come to you. It seemed to have worked for me back in 2000 in my first encounter with glow sticks and salmon. So I see why it could not work now. It has worked with these old time researchers as well. Ones who I cannot even remember their names no more since it has been so long. Tactics that have worked. If you have had encounters then you have to think back to the point that led up to your encounters. There is not if's about it. Why change some thing that has worked in the past. Proven methods should not be changed. One might be able to modify that method . But if it stops you from reaching your goal. Then go back to what worked. They are flesh and blood and do leave physical evidence. So this does mean that they can make mistakes. Just as humans who are not perfect they too can make mistakes like us. We have seen these mistakes in reports. Like I have been saying the math is there. We just have to look for it and put the puzzle together. This is what this is a puzzle that we need to find the pieces that will solve this puzzle. That puzzle is the truth.

That is a great post. Enjoy the 🏆 I agree with you, especially the part well you know which part.😄

That is a set of very very good questions. I think no, it should logically NOT be this hard, so something is wrong with the logic we are using. I do not think non-existence is a serious option .. having seen 2 on different occasions, it is not an option I, personally, can take seriously. If I were hallucinating, how did I hallucinate what Roger and Bob filmed when I'd never seen the film? I do not think we are incompetent. I believe we are, as your question asks, focused on the smoke and not the fire. It is about the only thing that makes sense. So the question I'm left with is ... what is the fire? To me that suggests our assumptions are wrong. Possibly the ones we speak are correct but the ones we act are wrong. Perhaps we do not know how to do the thing we should do so we cling to the thing we know how to do and pretend they are one and the same. What it means is that our efforts are off target and will never get us to where we are trying to go in any systematic way, the only thing continuing the search does is keep us out giving serendipity a chance. .. it's the best I've got. MIB

Dr. Sykes report on Zana is skewed by those reporting on his findings, rendering their spin on his data. Dr. Sykes has stated he believes Zana was an Almasty and he relayed descriptions of her as passed down by villagers to bolster that point, like hair covered, 6'6". could out run a horse and swim raging rivers after an ice thaw. The West African DNA he found, according to him, was similar to what existed 100,000 years ago and was not thought to have existed into modern times. Moreover, Sykes can only look at mtDNA passed down to grandchildren and only looked at so much.