Leaderboard

You remember a quotation from 40 years ago? Hmm, impressive. I mean, right down to the precise date, location, and exact quotation.

You are correct. I have indisputable technical proof. To All, it is forbidden to have more than one account on the BFF, only trolls do that. Thank You Arvedis for sniffing him out. Here is your cookie, enjoy!

Bigfoot discovery? You have got to be kidding. On Jan. 23, 1981, President Jimmy Carter announced to TV news cameras from his garden in Georgia, that "The Bigfoot are real, they are paranormal, and they are supposed to be people. There are people (in government) who do not want you to know that." In conclusion, there is no "Bigfoot Discovery" that can technically be made when the U.S. Government has essential already announced publicly that they are real. So if you are looking to become famous by discovering Bigfoot, you are a little late. Better change to hunting Nessie, because the government has not announced that, that green serpent is real and is paranormal. They are spotted all over the world however.

I didnt stop to take this picture but thought you guys would get a kick out of it. Yaak MT Saloon

I get the reasoning, but I'm not so sure on the warning shot...if it were the real deal you probably just blew it. My killing experience is limited to regular game, but I know from big bucks and mature gobblers you take the 1st clean shot you get at a hopefully (and preferably) stationary unsuspecting target and make it count because odds are you won't get the 2cnd shot.(and that's with trophy size regular game, much less cryptid stuff) iow, be in it to win it. There in lies the rub... I guess it depends on observation before the shot. If it stops & lights up a cigarette then yeah, warning shot😄

Facebook has kind of taken over the internet as far as a centralized resource of shared info. It's not Titter, which blows IMO. FB is where everyone who wants to be is in your business and you are in theirs. I subscribe to a vast number of BF stuff and over the years, now can go through my feed and pick out the interesting and fun updates pretty quickly. There's only 1 person with a vengeance for Mike Paterson (Toejam on this forum) because he doesn't want Mike to profit on YT for what he perceives as hoaxing. To the rest of the BF community, the joke is over. Mike was duped pretty harshly for a few years but oddly, there is still a community (on FB and YT) that believes in the talking BF. Mike still believes it too, which is sad. Mike is a decent guy and a decent wildlife photographer who got himself wrapped up in a make believe paranormal scenario. So he is a bit over the edge but undeserving of further ridicule and veiled personal attacks. Piling on videos to discredit Mike is unnecessary.

Hear ya on that. But like I've said before, fire a round over "its" head. If it hollers out "DON'T SHOOT!" then...........don't shoot

The soundtrack to your vid is awful. I had to disengage after maybe 30 seconds but it felt longer. So it looks like now you have 2 accounts here, The Truth and Todd Prescott. I like your Todd posts better so far.

Yesterday Left Colville to Ione, past Sullivan lake up over Pass creek pass, Hughes meadows in Idaho (44 degrees/rain) down to Priest river, Sandpoint, Bonners Ferry and crashed last night on a FS road called Cougar ridge above Yaak river. Today Drove to Yaak, then over to Koocanusa lake, Libby Dam, Kootenai river into Libby. Currently eating ice cream. Gonna go back to Troy, go down the Bull River to Clark Fork river and then on to Lolo hot springs to go soak. More pictures to come. Its very possible to go from NE Washington to NW Montana by FS dirt roads. But past Nordman, Idaho to Bonners Ferry Idaho I dont know the way. The rivers are all swollen, it looks like spring. The massive cedars in Wa/Id line were a treat. IMG_3238.MOV

I'm stalking skunk apes in south Florida, no luck so far

As one who believes that sasquatches are on the road to extinction, and have been for at least the past 500 years, I also believe that their numbers might be increasing in some regions. For example, I am fully convinced that their numbers have decreased dramatically over the past 175 years in what was likely their best habitat (northwest California, western Oregon, and western Washington), but have been more stable or maybe even grown in British Columbia, Alberta, and Yukon, and Ontario.

It's not a reasonable comparison. You keep bringing this up in various threads and reiterating her height 6'6" and physical features make such a comparison reasonable. Your theory cannot be substantiated by Sykes' own research. Nowhere does Sykes say or imply or even muse that Zana was a bigfoot. Nothing beyond having a sub-Saharan African lineage. In fact, none of Sykes' work has confirmed anything regarding Bigfoot. It is purely your own hypothesis to involve Zana in the discussion, using Sykes' inconclusive analysis. Zana was human. Patty is an undefined creature which come call Bigfoot. We'll never get Patty's DNA to be 100% certain the two are not related but we know that Sykes' own research cancels out your hypothesis. Sykes never said Zana was an almasty/bigfoot.

Reasonable: The comparison is perfectly reasonable. You just reject it. It is not my theory. And Sykes research has no bearing on the similarities that we can all see on the PG film with the written descriptions of Zana. He does, however, suggest that she may be a yeti. Do you deny that Sykes noted that her lineage did not match those currently known in Africa, and thus suggested that her unknown line may have emerged from Africa a hundred thousand years or so. Zana has been involved in the study of yetis/almas/bigfoot by others, not me. My noting that might upset you, but that will only increase my zeal to do it more often. You don't want me to do that, do you? Neanderthals were human. Denisovans were human. "Hobbits" were human. Sasquatches might be human. Hell, even I'm human (or at least partly human). So? And her image is very similar to the descriptions of Zana. And you appear to have an aversion to Sykes, or those who comment on his words, as well as virtually everybody else. This discussion is about the best candidate for Bigfoot, and the poll even includes entities as vague as "forest people". Since Zana's dna the target of a renowned geneticist, and his conclusion was one of clear continued interest, I would say that Zana is "reasonable" to bring up in this discussion.