Leaderboard

Tired 🤚

Here's the thing. Menstruation usually marks the LEAST fertile point of a human female's cycle; strewing used pads or tampons around in the bush might bring attention because it's human blood* but it's certainly not an invitation, pheromone-wise. *apologies to those who thought women secreted Windex; I'm sorry you had to find out this way

Great apes, including humans do not have mating seasons. The wisdom behind the why is that we evolved in tropical climates where there are no seasonal changes in climate. So there is no penalty for having offspring during winter vs summer. Also if reports like Ostman are to be believed? It seems that they may travel in small family groups like Neanderthals. Where a patriarch would have access to females all year long. We don’t know how to love call Bigfoot like we do Elk or Deer or Moose. What we do know how to do is appeal to their stomach. A dying rabbit is a dying rabbit to Bears, Cougars, Bobcats, Wolves, Coyotes, etc...

I have thought about this too, but somehow using a sexual lure to bring in an excited and romantically inclined alpha male with one thing on his mind close to me just doesn't sit well. Best bring a little vaseline though, just in case. Good luck, and welcome to the forum.

I won't dismiss either out of hand, because I have heard first hand experiences of both, from people that I trust. I was present during one such occasion, and did not see for myself, what others claimed, but I was distracted by the Native American guy who could not move his legs during the encounter. We were looking in a different direction. This particular poster lost me at 'top of the line studio microphone'. I do audio recording, and I use about $10 worth of microphone hardware (not counting the recorder), with a $2 omni-directional element, modified to reduce high frequency bug noises. A studio microphone has a a specific directional pattern, meant to eliminate noises from anywhere other than directly in front of the mic. This is not ideal for recording sasquatch incidents, invisible or not.

Wrong word really. Stirring the inciteful pot over a high flame isn't what this Forum is about. What's next? Chupacabras? Jersey Devils? Unicorns? Leprechauns? Pixies? Doesn't matter in the least. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. The onus of proof is yours and yours alone. Beyond trolling this Forum and not taking the mature responsibility of backing up your OWN claims, I see no point in you being here. Oh, did I mention trolling?

So little is known of bigfoot I’m often wary of anyone that claims to know for certain anything. The best people, imo, to learn from are knowledgeable hunters and out doors-man and what I try to take away from them is basic knowledge of the wilderness.

Human beings are not creatures of the night. We are not adapted for managing well at night. Mist of us ate inside at night, asleep. Those who are awake, are likely indoors. Those who are outdoors at night stay in well lit areas - roads and sidewalks mostly. They (bf) simply go where we do not go. That creek in a gully that runs through town? Probably dark at night, and no one is there. Usable terrain to them. Who is out at night? Homeless, mentally ill, crack heads, prostitutes, night shift employees etc - and even they stay in lit areas for the most part. I sometimes walk my dog at 11pm for the last time, and i could do anything i wanted out there - I'm surrounded by people inside their homes and no one sees me unless they make an effort, or by chance or mistake. I don't have a problem with thinking bigfoots could get from here to there in the dark, right next to us. Besides, if you hear a noise in the dark, our instinct is to get to a light source, not check it out. They are our opposites in nealy every way.

You might not be aware that I have seen your demand before. Your demand boils down to an impossibility. That impossibility is, " show me visual proof that something is not visual!" Which is both hysterical and impossible. The only way for someone to see that nothing is visual that is making a nearby noise, is to be present in the flesh at the site. The internet is not a site, therefore the proof cannot be provided on the internet. I have described the equipment for you to buy and how to use it, but you will do neither because in the final analysis, you cannot psychological deal with an invisible Bigfoot, which is a common phobia of newbies. And you are too lazy to proceed beyond typing on the internet. Now it's your turn. Provide proof that the Bigfoot are not just flesh and blood in your video, but prove that they are flesh and blood all of the time, day in and day out, year round. In no way am I attacking you. I am very curious as to what makes you think that Sasquatch have an ability to always be flesh and blood, when scientists admit that higher dimensions do exist. Try buying (oh dear) the book X3 by Adrian Dvir, and read it cover to cover. Deep in that book, you will find out the intricacies of invisibility. There are also a handful of books that preach that the Bigfoot are invisible. Buy (oh dear) one of those and read it. And when you speak to a Bigfoot, now write this down, they don't speak back. Or at least, not to me. When you are out in the woods and in search of the Bigfoot, and whispering quietly to your like minded buddies, the BIGFOOT ARE LISTENING TO EVERY WHISPER BECAUSE THEY ARE ALSO HIGHLY TELEPATHIC. So your greatest plans have been foiled by you simply talking about them in the field. If you want to set up a camera that they somehow can't hear the very high frequency sounds, you have to have it encased in plastic like a go-pro, and underwater plastic protector or it must be inside of a car and shooting out of a window. But while you are setting the camera up and turning it on, you have to be thinking of something else like baseball, apple pie or how Trump is screwing up the U.S. beyond all recognition. But in the final analysis, you won't do any of this because all Bigfoot researchers are lazy and they are especially lazy when it comes to exploring proof of a type of existence that they simply cannot deal with. I did not record it. I have recorded a conversation between myself and world famous author Robert Michael Pyle, where we we sitting in the woods near his home and the little paranormal forest person that I brought along with me, made some familiar sniffling into the microphone and then did some soft monkey hoots, that we did not clearly hear at the time but were apparent upon listening to the recording. I warned Robert about the sniffler before we started, and the sniffler did not disappoint. I travelled a hundred miles to get to Robert's house, and had no passengers in my car. Which means that the sniffler is paranormal in my world. The inexperienced disbeliever will have an endless list of inadequate reasons to explain it, however.