Leaderboard

Wow. Thanks, Gigantor. You made be blush in embarassment. The paperback version should be out this week. I hope the Forum will be a place to critique my work and for Q and A. I will check regularly to provide prompt answers.

The Sasquatch Genome Project: A Failed DNA Study by @hvhart (Author), Jeff Meldrum (Foreword) Because of the extraordinary claims in "Novel North American Hominins, Next Generation Sequencing of Three Whole Genomes and Associated Studies" (Ketchum et al., 2013) the Bigfoot Community has been debating it ever since. This book is the result of research over seven years (more than the original study) in understanding the Sasquatch Genome Project and its published paper. Dr. Haskell Hart tells the story of his increasing involvement and understanding of the paper as he presents his own results and conclusions, which are at odds with the Ketchum et al. paper. He first explains the structure and function of DNA as background. With 45 figures and 29 tables of data (more than in the original paper), all carefully explained to the layman, this extensive scientific critique of the paper is the only one of its kind.

How many BF reports period have collaborating evidence? I’d venture to guess not many. I just find it a rather silly of people who claim to be incapable of misidentification.

The principle is the same. A seasoned woods person is not going to draw a conclusion that a fleeting, and momentary, glimpse of something dark and hairy is a bigfoot. He, or she, will correctly determine that a conclusion is simply not possible.

I am a returning member, Haskell V. Hart. I have been a vocal critic of the Sasquatch Genome Project and have two peer reviewed articles on the subject of the Ketchum DNA study(Journal of Cryptozoology, v. 4)) and DNA research in general (on Relict Hominoid Inquiry). I just published a book on the subject which is available as a Kindle book and soon as a paperback,

In the years that I have gone up in northern Michigan. I have never spotted a black bear ut in those woods. Now I am not saying that they are not out there I have not seen one. But what reason would a bear have to be standing up on it's hind legs and be walking on then in the first place. It seems that it would be un-natural for a bear to be doing this act on it's own. The only reason that I can come up with that a bear would be doing this is to sniff the air for scent. Now a bear that is walking on it's back two feet is not going to leave 72" heel to heel tracks behind. But I can see how people can make the mistake of seeing a bear and calling it a Bigfoot. As long as the bear is not moving and standing behind some tree. This is possible and this mistake can take place in reporting of some witnesses. But most of the witnesses do know their species that live in the forest. But I would rule out some who only vacation in the forest. But this is only my take on this subject.