Leaderboard

thanks! kinda lol, im also an independent toy maker, that little guy is a work in progress and is part of our "Cryptid Creeper" line at Wild & Weird West Virginia LLC. if your interested in seeign any of my other stuff its all on instagram under skinwalker_sculpts

Since you can't prove the creature is mythological why use the term? Though you may think its use as being somehow necessary, I see it as an unnecessary disrespect to the Forum. You can have a nice conversation and get still your point across without the unveiled sharp stick.

My wife and I were hiking the area today just getting our dog some exercise when she noticed some tracks running perpendicular to the trail and making 3 total steps across it. One was un-touched the other two were kriss crossed with mt. Bike tread. Of course I never hike w/o plaster. 28° this evening as we were leaving which made for a extra long trip back and fourth as I took my wife and dpg back to the truck while there was still some daylight left. I then went back to the spot where the plasted had been curing for about 40 min by the time I made it back and then high tailed it back to the truck to get the cast cleaned up. Here the pics of what we found, without even really being out there to find anything.

Great selection of moth man, strange squid, monster hulk, loads more sculpted characters and keychains — Do you have a shop or mail order online? Cute baby, too. Worth checking out.

So if Meldrum is doing real science. It’s science. But if he is saying Bigfoot tracks are real? He is a quack? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251678467_Ichnotaxonomy_of_the_Laetoli_trackways_The_earliest_hominin_footprints We don’t have foot bones from Afarensis. And yet scientists make theories that explain bipedal locomotion that coincides with The tracks and our earliest ancestors. What are your credentials to discredit scientists findings? Yes. We need the foot. But the tracks lead to the foot if they are geniune. And a scientist saying some tracks are genuine? Certainly lends to the validity. Yes?

To me, the mid-tarsal break was as similar an odd find as seeing breasts on Patty. Both are things that a hoaxer would never have thought of in the 60s. These items, and more, ended any thought of creature mythology.

The video is coming soon:)

Good work, Skinwalker and spouse! I noticed in the Next to last picture: strange little figure with shiny beady eyes and a skinny arm showing. A few more characters in the background. Is this your museum of the weird and unexplained?

Brass bench stock is set in place to mark the area where overpour begins. Print measures 8.5 inches long and 5 inches wide at the ball, 3.25 inches at the heel. Heel is rounded and smooth with the excepting of the cast running through a mycelial thread and capturing the path of the thread.

Are you suggesting there aren't or haven't been a large number of hunters/outdoorsmen out and about over the last 200-300 yrs willing to take the shot? Not sure how the cougar analogy is a strategy that applies to Bigfeet hunting please elaborate. Yeah BFRO never heard of it LOL.....Bigfeets continent wide distribution but still nothing, just more stories, they are good evidence of a social construct/myth making but nothing more.

If someone walks that close to you while your hunting, the responsible thing to do would be to politely make contact with them and let them know your in the area.

@BlackRockBigfoot and @ShadowBorn i appreciate both of your POVs here. Text format can be a pain to "read in to" and is often misinterpreted. So no harm no foul on SBs end, again thanks for the input. As for the ridges, I'm going to try amd get better images, of the toe area. The smaller rock that was captured in the track 100% forced the toes to dig that deep from the step off. It measures at 11in with the ridge of the foot bent downward and toes curled, with that in mind the foot was likely 12-13in in real life. so its small for a alledged sasquatch but ive found 10-11in tracks before in this area previously. The likelyhood of someone being barefoot in the area is pretty low, as its a pretty good bit off any trails and out a creek a little ways but I cant rule out the possibility. I always err on the side of casting everything if for no other reason than to keep your skills up to snuff. Ill post up close shots of the toes shortly.

Blackrockbigfoot Do you have a problem how I see things. You had plenty of time to answer my post way before Skinwalker13 did. You could have told me not to armchair him way before i asked him the question about the hair I thought I seen in the photo. See military folks think different out in the field and when looking at photo's. This is why I asked about what I was seeing in the photo. In the photo it had that shadow as though it looked like a hair but as we found out it was a snail crawling trail. So for me i trust on what Skinwalker13 is posting. This print can go either way as being human or Bigfoot. What does not make it for me is that it was in a muddy grade. As far as it goes for me this could very well be a boot print. But the fact that he was able to get a casting in that wet muddy grade is outstanding. I give him a great job. The other thing is that I have with you is this. Are you hell bent trying to make me look bad? Since this was edited two hours ago after the fact of what was posted by Skinwalker13. I do not blame you on what has gone on the BFF but the Powers that Be who once ran this site. Which were on BFF 1.0 .Like the so called Data loss of the movement of data from server to server. I can go into details But I will not This is not the place for it.

Where are you seeing a hair? There is no visible hair in those pics. Marks in the sand, maybe. But no hair. Don't armchair quarterback the guy. He apparently knows what he is doing. ETA. nevermind. Skinwalker13 addressed the hair above.