Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/04/2021 in all areas

  1. One person in remote Sasquatch territory is too many,. Think about it, what if it was you who wanted the safety of a remote area for you and your family and a stranger showed up? What would be your first reaction? And not just a stranger but a completely different kind of stranger? Day or night? When the Olympic Project found the first nesting site it was apparently active as a couple of nests still had fresh greenery attached. What happened? And then the recent discovery last year with nests half constructed. What happened? Shane Corson said he heard what sounded like something bipedal walk away as he approached. He suspected that he had interrupted the nest building activity. I really doubt anything went back after that intrusion. We need to learn and understand this, especially since the lesson is so recent. If after this someone is bothered a hair, just think how bothered the Sasquatch is, or any other animal for that matter. I don't mean to be harsh or critical here, but there comes a point where our own sensitivity to Nature needs to be rebooted.
    1 point
  2. Here is Jim Boyd video. He was a Lake Band Indian and singer song writer who took interest in Bigfoot. He would be the same tribe as Patrick’s mother. He passed unfortunately recently.
    1 point
  3. We're going to have to hang out in front of his house in the bushes. Ambush him when he gets home from work. I'll hold him down while you swab him. I'll swab the next one.
    1 point
  4. Im well aware of the story. As I look across the river at the Colville Reservation. We played the Inchelium Hornets in sports. It’s well known Paulides has boughten hook line and sinker into the Bigfoot = Human hypothesis. There are 12 tribes on that reservation. Including the non treaty Nez Perce (Chief Joseph). I have never seen anyone that remotely looked like they were half Sasquatch. Or Stick Indian as they would call em. Ketchum’s man-bear-pig DNA study should be thrown out and never spoke of again. It’s a mess and represents broken DNA of many different known species instead of an entire genome of a novel unknown species. I do admire the 411 books. Brought many strange cases to light. But I reject that what we see in the PGF can produce viable offspring with a human. We cannot have our cake and eat it too. Midtarsal breaks, different arm ratios, Size, height, lack of fire and tools, Sagittal crest..... We point out significant differences in why it CANNOT be a man in a suit? And then turn around and claim that they can produce viable offspring with us? Which is it? It would be super easy to have Patrick’s descendants spit in a cup. Give me an address and I can be there in a hour or two. The Gifford-Inchelium ferry is just south of my house.
    1 point
  5. For the same reason why most researchers don't spend much time looking for evidence in southern New England. Any Sasquatches reported from the area, and there are a few, more than likely do not constitute a resident population. I was up in South County Rhode Island over the Summer visiting my parents with my fiance. My fiance and I were outside around sun set when we both heard a loud, deep bellow similar to the Bigfoot calls that Bobo makes on the Finding Bigfoot program. We both found the sound intriguing even though it most probably had a human origin. The area where my parents live is heavily wooded, so presumably a Bigfoot could pass through the area temporarily. The BFRO lists four reports from Rhode Island. But I highly doubt there is a resident Sasquatch population in Rhode Island or anywhere else in southern New England. Any Sasquatches sighted in Rhode Island, assuming the reports are genuine, are almost certainly passing though the area temporarily. Perhaps coming down from Maine or one of the more heavily forested northern New England states.
    1 point
  6. There is no way that Paulides broke character and proclaimed he was aware of or researched actual bf hybrids. He may have mentioned something about it as a far off speculative subject. But even that is suspiciously off target for what we know of as his m.o.. Paulides has been ultra careful of his position and has never speculated. He has dropped dry hints every now and again. So either the claimant finds the exact podcast with exact timestamp or it didn't happen.
    1 point
  7. I know who Sykes is... I know that Evans is the veterinarian tv host who gathered DNA samples... What I still don't know is how Paulides supposedly had the names and locations of literal human hybrids, what he was planning on doing with that information, and why he was scared away from pursuing their DNA and into investigating strange disappearances with Missing 411. Nor do I understand how his comments on a podcast that no one seems to remember are vitally important to the search for Bigfoot...so vital that anyone interested in the topic should be familiar with them. Constantly reiterating Sykes's history is not answering any of these questions that your posts have generated. Sykes and even Evans are not the points of contention here. I am trying hard to figure out your complaints about Paulides, but I don't think that we are going to get anywhere with this and I think that further attempts to try and get clarification are just going to fail and drive this thread even more off topic.
    1 point
  8. No, there was a two part, each one hour, video presentation of the Coast to Coast Interview I found one line at that time. Coast to Coast is always trying to package and repackage their work to make a dime so I don't know where that is right now. As I recall, it was the Ghost Guy not George Knapp (who I recognize when I see him) but I may be wrong. Who ever it was did an OK job interviewing Paulides so his identity would be incidental to me. The fact that bigfoot DNA is possibly out there and available for sampling can hardly be incidental. Does chasing bigfoot and getting pictures mean anything? No. It is entertainment, not proof. A body, bones or DNA are the only means of proof. When any of these present themselves as possibilities I don't understand why others interested in bigfoot would not sit up and take notice. Dr. Evans is the person whom you might recall gathered sample all around the world for Dr. Bryan Sykes on that television series. Dr. Evans did the latest on on his own and got a bear DNA specialist to reexamine some of the alleged brown bear-polar bear hybrid evidence. When he got the eDNA evidence with a great chain of evidence, done in the field by a geneticist, that was truly great work.
    1 point
  9. Pure conjecture on my part... but, they probably avoid open areas instinctively. They are obviously very stealthy or we would have more evidence of their existence. They seem to travel across more open areas occasionally, because trackways have been found in the open before. But, they seem to spend the majority of their time in covered areas. Those open area crossings are probably the exception to the rule.
    1 point
  10. Better quality. I'm not part of the "us" that bigfoot comes to in open fields. The interactions I've had in more populated places have been very tenuous / ambiguous. Those I've had out in deep woods tend to be less ambiguous. Why? I think because they feel safer and more in control "out there." Even if that were not the case, I LIKE wilderness, like getting away from people. In a very real sense, bigfoot is an additional benefit but not often the main purpose for being out there. MIB
    1 point
  11. All citizens must receive mandatory pillow implants in both hands.
    1 point
  12. @VAfooter my NDA was essentially a handshake and I signed an agreement to not talk trash lol. Which isnt even close to problem, ive done TV stuff in my other career and this was by far the most professional team ive ever worked. So after it airs I can fill you all in on anything that didn't make the final cut.
    1 point
  13. Don't listen to the critics skinwalker. I have the public relations team on this. We'll be doing new photo shoots, new trailers, the whole deal.
    1 point
  14. Took your advise, that older pic was from a rather rough period of time. Update was much needed. As for the stories those will have to wait until at least a couple days after launch.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...