Leaderboard

https://www.bigfootandbeyondpodcast.com/listen

Funny you should say that, Huntster, as the trackway I found and took John Green to see a little over 40 years ago was crossing a mountain pass in the snow, from one valley to another. The tracks were unnoticeable on the hard gravel logging road, but showed up clearly once I reached the snow line in that pass. It was leaving the same valley I had seen one in the year before.

What do they have in common? https://www.americanscientist.org/article/do-the-eyes-have-it So if this is true? This would be a uniquely Homo Sapiens trait. That not even other species of Homo would have shared with us wide scale. Does Sasquatch exhibit white around the pupils? I’ve never read that they do.

They definitely are not a 501(c) non-profit. The BFRO is incorporated in California and under the laws of that state had to identify itself as an entertainment company (rather than, say, a hospitality or service company). I will note for anyone that wants to find them that there are at least two BFRO threads extant before this one - both may be available only to premium members. IIRC, one focused on a near implosion of the BFRO and the other was specific as to the expeditions. I believe, but will not swear, that the information required to find the BFRO's business license is in one of those threads. For both Norse & VAfooter, not sure where I saw it, but sometime after Finding Bigfoot went big, they announced that they were going to start obscuring location data. They also started putting bigger boxes on their map set to hide precisely where an encounter occurred. They stated that the primary basis for doing this was to protect the privacy of witnesses. Which is a good idea - I've been to the specific location of two New York incidents reported on in the Baby Bigfoot episode and have been able to identify other specific homes and phone numbers from reports made before they adopted that policy. Same as what WSA said - not a member and no collateral involvement with the BFRO but their database AND the reports they make public are a gold standard for the 5 W's of an encounter. Compare certain other "research" groups whose reports read, "Yeah, I saw a bigfoot at Aunt Em's house and shot it and made steak out of it." And weak tea like that gets posted as an "encounter." What the heck is the SSR?? I must be confused. Often am.

Louis Agazzi? Louis Agassiz - Wikipedia

Welcome to the BFF, Cornbread!! I think you will find additional information here to keep your interests ignited.

Yes. And we have similar reports here. I think the main difference is the worlds mountaineering community is climbing all over the Himalayas. That’s the brass ring in their world. The cascades or coastal mountains in BC and Alaska? Less so.

The story goes on and on about the edge that dogs gave us by hunting more efficiently, but it doesn't acknowledge that dogs helped to PROTECT us, too. They are superb warning systems. Therefore, if you are getting preyed upon, and your dogs alert you, you have time to defend yourselves. Also, they can hunt animals but also other bipedal hominids, leading you to their secret hiding places. Dogs definitely give you an edge.

No. Reproduction was the edge we had. Short version: Tropical species or tropical races of a species reproduce many times per year. African sapiens are tropical animals and can go into reproductive phase once per month. Northern animals usually reproduce once per year and that was probably the situation with Neanderthals. Even a little reproductive edge matters. This is pure evolution. Wolves reproduce once per year. Dogs come into heat twice per year. There are hundreds of thousands of times more dogs and than wolves after only 15,000 years of dogs. Yeah, I know all about paleo-dogs. They may have existed but then gone extinct. Modern dogs originated in Asia. So if dogs where the big thing, why has genetic flow always moved from west to east in Homo?

Welcome to the BFF FullBattery Mat and Gunner74!! I think you will find a lot more here to feed your interests.

Not sure the Feds care if anyone makes ancestral claims. As wtth the Kennewick man they just wanted the bones taken and buried someplace rather than studied. I have wondered if their big worry is that the first peoples are no more native to this continent than we are. The so called NA were simply one of the first groups known to migrate here. My gut feeling is that BF were already here watching them come. No proof of that other than some tribes oral histories say that BF are the ancient ones that were here when the tribe got here.

No way to know.