Neanderthal women also had a differently shaped birth canal and were giving birth to babies with a more robust, i.e. less flexible skeleton.
I am like Norse... I don't know what sort of point you are trying to make. You are shotgun blasting out information (some of it ten years out of date) mixed with conjecture.
"Pure Neanderthals were long gone before dog domestication." Dogs were domesticated up to 40,000 years ago...around the same time that Neanderthals went extinct. You are using numbers which have been out of favor for quite awhile.
"There is no technical edge sapiens had over Neanderthal." You then go on about how sapiens used needles to adapt and flourish...which (as far as we know right now) Neanderthals did not. Which kind of proves Norse's point of technological advantage aiding in homo sapiens' survival over Neanderthal...the point which you were trying to disprove. The use of technology gives an advantage. If opposing sides both have the possibility of developing the same technology, but only one side is able to develop and use it...that side had a technological advantage. The Nazis COULD have developed an atomic bomb first...the possibility of developing the technology was there. But, they didn't. Therefore the Allies had a technological advantage.
"Neanderthal women who would have come into heat once a year following the pattern of northern mammals." I am still confused by this. There is a theory that a slight drop in fertility rates (due to scarcity of food caused by change in climate) could have led to their extinction given their overall low numbers. But, you are saying that Neanderthal women only had the physical ability to ovulate once every twelve month cycle. You tie this somehow into the frequency which a wolf goes into heat compared to a domesticated dog. Where are you getting this information that Neanderthals were only fertile for a short window of time only once every year?