Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/18/2021 in all areas

  1. If they can produce infrasound, I would think it logical that they can hear it as well. Thunder can produce infrasound. From: http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_info/thunder.html "The dominant frequency of thunder energy is in the 100 Hz range. Thunder occurring in the infrasonic range (below 20 Hz) is inaudible to humans. Infrasonic thunder is considered to be related to sound conversion of energy stored in the thundercloud electrostatic field. Thus, thunder’s expanding hot gas channel produces an over-pressure (we hear it) while the electrostatic-pressure release mechanism produces an under-pressure or negative pressure change (we do not hear it) (Rakov and Uman, 2003). Of infrasonic sound, Viemeister (1961) speculated those lightnings were of low current/long duration (small amplitude/positive flashes?) which heated up the air so slowly that explosive air rupture did not occur. Sonic and infrasonic thunder can be observed in the same thunderstorm (Holmes et al, 1971). Both cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-ground lightning can generate infrasonic thunder (Rakov, personal communication)."
    2 points
  2. I think sasquatches are smart enough not to waste energy. They must coordinate hunting with the current weather conditions. I'm told they check their meat-e-r-ologist daily!
    2 points
  3. There are reports of very large hairy men, sometimes up to 20 ft. tall, in Alaska and Canada. These reports are rare but these reports do exist. They seem to differ from bigfoot in that they are tall but lean and sometimes are reported with four toes. Here is a short video: So the question is---are you on-board with this? Do you think they are real or are they legendary?
    1 point
  4. Hi, We have some understanding that Bigfoot migrates to lower elevations as the season changes colder. But, are they just following the food or unfrozen water or is there a bigger plan? I sometimes wonder if Bigfoot can use his heightened senses to determine if weather patterns are coming before they arrive? For example, I have a friend whose dog was terrified of thunderstorms, and, began to react before storms actually showed up, especially in the Spring and Summer seasons. This example leads into the science of animals vs. barometric pressure or even infrasound. If dogs can sense these things then why not a Bigfoot? Is there infrasound that thunder or wind emit? If a Bigfoot is sensitive to infrasound then couldn't it detect the distant rumblings of wind and thunder? When I think back to the possibility of Bigfoot hiding it's tracks, instinct or learned, would hunting or foraging before a storm hits ensure that any tracks would be obliterated? If the Bigfoots were settled in ahead of time with food, they wouldn't have to be wandering around much afterwards. So, are their senses more finely tuned to adapt to changing weather conditions? Please share your thoughts...
    1 point
  5. Keep your head up, buddy. This too shall pass.
    1 point
  6. Agreed to both! People are evil and people are idiots. A lot of the old newspaper stuff is just essentially tabloid stories about giants that was designed to sell newspapers. That's all. Uneducated but smart folks making a buck however they could. I don't think any of that is true. It's sensationalism designed to entertain. Like our "Finding Bigfoot" show today. A little bit of truth and a some talent and you're in the money. They could have been finding dinosaur bones or the bones of mega fauna, and not knowing what they were digging up. I do not believe in giants. I do know Bigfoot exist as a species. The world is a stranger place than we know, so I'll keep looking out there, but... However, there are MANY reports of very human-like Bigfoots, with very little hair. I am open to the idea that there's variations in hairy news, just like us. Some tribes/families may be more or less hirsute than others.
    1 point
  7. I think, and it did hurt lol, that they very likely can sense barometric pressure moving as well as being able to smell whats coming on the wind. We all know that wet dirt smell just before the rain hits. Having senses turned up to 11 would only increase that. Our most recent outing yeilded a footprint full of rain water, the other 5 had been beaten down by the rain, but the one that was better preserved was in the treeline in mud, kind of supporting the track covering aspects there. Animals are keen to whats going on, massive flock/herd movements before earth quakes or tsunamis have been witnessed over and over. Theres something they can all pick up on that most of us only observe the effect of. Before every big season changing storm or severe weather I always get a migraine out of the blue, so in a terrible way I can pick up on it too lol.
    1 point
  8. Thanks, @wiiawiwb. We go out often, but since the incredibly devastating fires, haven't found much, and so haven't posted much. We will continue to look, as the insanity of actively looking for an 800 pound, highly intelligent apex predator on his own home turf helps keeps me sane through the current insanity that is my life right now. That, and my dogs. If THAT makes any sense. But yes. Moon phase plays a role in activity, I am fairly certain. Water. Well, water is never far in Oregon, at least where we are.
    1 point
  9. As you know,my experience matches up with what you have seen. We tend to get more activity during a new or full moon.
    1 point
  10. I pay for a certain cable package and EB was included last year. My cable package hasn't changed so, naturally, I assumed the new season would be included. I'd watch EB again for free but the new season isn't worth enough to me to shell out an extra penny. Tout a` l'heure aka toodle loo.
    1 point
  11. @Arvedis So my wife is a teacher and the US Govt has 100% controled the info taught in classrooms for the last 15 years. Its done through stamdardized testing, if its not on the test its not taught. Which is why classes like home economics, civics, and economics are no longer taught in schools. They simply are not on the tests. Even textbooks have been formated as such, if its not on the test its not in the text either.
    1 point
  12. Reports are not proof. Fossil records and specimens are. Thanks for sharing. Have a 🏆 Too many vote downs in my honest opinion.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...