Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/25/2021 in all areas

  1. Greetings from Central Oregon. Im a slightly above middle-aged fellow with a lifelong interest in the subject ever since I was a boy. I'm into all sorts of "paranormal" topics. I look forward to gleaning information and entering discussions with others interested in the Sasquatch field.
    1 point
  2. Whatever is out there doing that has never worn shoes ever...absolutely. But if it kidnapped someone and was worried about them running off? Take their shoes...
    1 point
  3. Are they mutually exclusive? Just because one is true doesn’t mean that the other is impossible.
    1 point
  4. Something is walking barefoot in rough, cold, wet terrain with no problem at all... This is from just south of the Smokeys. Doesn’t look like a traditional Sasquatch print, nor does it have the broader look of the other prints that we found. A humans toes will separate in the mud, but won’t look as broad overall as what we found. To me, this looks like a barefoot human print. A bit smaller than a grown man. It’s not the only one found in that area, either. Could be a hiker way off trail who just decided to kick his shoes off for a relaxing trudge through cold mud and rocks. Without seeing what made the print, anything is possible. I will say that the fellow who took this pic doesn’t think that it was caused by feral humans, but his theory is even more out there than that...
    1 point
  5. Hence the word ‘savory’.
    1 point
  6. There are stories out of the Smokey’s above and beyond the Dennis Martin wild man... Around Haywood County in North Carolina there are stories of ‘beast people’ in the mountains there. I have shared this story with a couple of you in the past, but there is a survival instructor in that area that says there are some sort of upright feral creatures that caused him to shut down his classes...these things were described by one person as ‘beast men’. Not too far from there there are human bare prints found in the mud and snow. I find the idea of feral humans more believable than ‘beast men’, but maybe it’s a smaller breed of Sasquatch. As far as the differences between actual human prints and small Sasquatch prints...we have found bare footprints that are within human range lengthwise, but seemed disproportionately wide and flat. I called them ‘Fred Flintstone feet’. There have been other prints found in the mountains that look pretty much like a human foot...except that the prints are found in places were you wouldn’t normally find people walking barefoot. Ascribing rational behavior to either a group of people who have willingly left modern society to live barefoot in the mountains or a group of self sustaining folks who have lived in those mountains for generations without contact with the modern world...that doesn’t make sense. They could be abducting hikers for breeding purposes, curiosity, loneliness, or other less savory reasons known only to them.
    1 point
  7. AWESOME! I just put a RSI Smartcap on my Tacoma. 🤙🏽
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...