Leaderboard

The North American Bigfoot Center tweeted out this pic of a soon to be ready display of a nest from the O.P. site. I've listened to Derek Randall and found the whole project very intriguing. It"d be fascinating to see one of the nests up close.

@hiflier Less, you forget my questions I asked, for you to answer. And this time I ask, answer them in earnest. . 1) How many samples have you collected? 2) How many have successfully been sent to a test center and resulted in DNA results? 3) How many if any came back with Human or listed as contaminated? 4) How much on average did each test cost you and what was the time it took to get results? Could you please answer these directly? It will probably help people get an idea of what they may be in for. And I am speaking any form of DNA, be it physical sample or E-DNA, soil, water, or air? Thanks in advance.

Somehow you're under the impression that all people in the field are there to find and capture scientifically-acceptable evidence for the world to see. That is not even in the top-ten objectives when I'm out in the field. My sole purpose is to get a sighting or have an encounter. If I were blessed with producing hard evidence, I likely wouldn't share it with anyone. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if there aren't many other people out there who only want to prove to themselves these creatures exist and would never share details with anyone but family and close friends. So I'll stay with my old, tired, lazy, and unimaginative methods that are destined for failure. I really like them and they've grown on me!

Hey all! IronJohnFlint here. Long time Bigfoot believer, although I have never seen one. With all the reports and data out there one has to think they are real. I recently purchased ThinkerThunker's book and the section on audio spectrograms really got me to thinking. Audio is probably the best piece of evidence on Bigfoot. I currently use SonicVisualiser and Audacity to display spectrograms. I am currently looking for some downloadable Bigfoot sounds.

So Flirs were being used 30 years ago in BF research? So Drones were being used 30 years ago in BF research? So you, Hiflier, have sole discretion on how long a method can be used before it is obsolete and we move on?? So how many DNA samples come back negative before you move on from that??? When does that become obsolete in your eyes?

I'm confident that it's real, but the video footage is poor.

I have told this Forum many times, and since you're member, that includes you, too, Twist, that when I get something I'll let people know. Ask your questions again then. Be patient, okay?