Leaderboard

My biggest pet peeve on any forum is when a person who claims to be a scientist speaks in absolutes. It really erks me bad. I am sorry for the confrontation. You caught me in a bad mood.

I like worms. Earth worms, jelly worms, worm holes. If its wormy, I'm squirmy

Hi Y'All! So, the other day my 12 year old nephew and I were discussing Sasquatch. He, like a lot of folks, has been taught that they do not exist. As he says, "Bigfoot ain't real." Beings that I have had my own experiences with the Wild Man of the Woods, I told him in no uncertain terms that they most certainly do exist and I know because I have seen them up close and personal. He laughed at me, saying , "Oh Auntie CiCi! It's just the old Hippie chick in ya!" Ha! But our conversation has been knocking around his brain some. Today he asks me do I think Sasquatch is wicked mean like many of the podcasts and videos on YouTube portray them or are they nice and kind...gentle creatures who are mostly just curious and sometimes mischievous. I told him that I think they are like people, in that there are good ones and bad ones. What do y'all think?

My name is Jack. I've been interested in bigfoot since I was a little kid. I have watched a ton of bigfoot related shows and recently found this website while researching bigfoot information. I have never had a Bigfoot encounter myself, but I am a believer in him. I hope to learn much more about bigfoot via this website, and one day maybe go searching for Bigfoot in the Appalachians.

Crickets. Maybe an alien left the downvote.

How is that? https://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-just-found-a-second-dyson-sphere-star https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/have-aliens-found-us-a-harvard-astronomer-on-the-mysterious-interstellar-object-oumuamua/amp Physical evidence of Sasquatch is zip, zero, nada…. We need a body. Which should be easy considering its a man ape living in the woods of north America. Physical evidence of aliens is FLIR footage of craft doing unimaginable maneuvers while toying with our most advanced weaponry. We will probably never get a body. We are in the petri dish, not the other way around. At our primitive state we are exploring the solar system with robots. So logically speaking we may be dealing with the same thing. But we just don't know. But boiled down to brass tacks the case for aliens right now is a much stronger case. I wish it was the other way around. The implications are rather terrifying.

I would not welcome the attention or hassle of it all. I hope I never find one dead. I would rather have someone else win the jackpot in this case. In the case of Los Vegas, that is another story.

You'll have to pick up the "debate" in a couple of months when Vinchy gets his posting privileges back.

I'm not going anywhere. And the color of the sky here is blue today, but it's as often grey as blue, and occasionally red. Springtime in Alaska is pretty nice. Not much rain or snow. Who is Q?

Since when has the scientific method been expected to "evolve"? When it met your opinions? Please review the definition if "hominid": Thus, all species within the family of Hominidae are human, but hominids like Australopithecines are not. So Homo floresiensis was human, but Australopithecus afarensis That's true. What's more, even if I could I wouldn't. Correct. But your opinions are. The evidence shows that Zana was a sub-Saharan human, so yes, scientifically, I know what Zana was, and I'll write about her as often as I please. And frankly, since the more I write about her seems to increasingly unhinge you, think I'll step it up a bit. Are you ready for a ride?

The evidence for Sasquatch is overwhelming. We have gone over this many times before ad hundreds of threads have been devoted to the subject. Thus far, evidence for the existence of aliens is lacking. Even with our advanced telescopic technology no trace of alien civilizations have been found anywhere in the universe. Such would certainly be detected if it existed.

Except that that pesky "S" word denotes a METHOD, not any religious cabal thing. Such paranoic silliness......

Not just part of the Cabal. I am the leader of the cabal!

I believe they are curious and mischievous until they are threatened for the most part. However, personalities can vary from one life form to another and from one species to another and from one individual to another. You tick a mean sparrow off and you are relatively safe. Tick off a docile bull elk, moose, grizzly bear and you've got a whole nother story. Tick one of those off that are particularly mean and you have yet another story. I think it could be the same for sasquatches.

And as an archaeologist I absolutely despise anyone who claims aliens or any other imaginary beings had a role in building the pyramids or any other advancement in human civilization. Such people are cranks and imbeciles who deserve to be tarred and feathered in the pubic square as the ridiculous clowns that they are. Such a position is downright insulting to the intelligence and ingenuity of humans in general, and ancient man in particular.

At this point legend/myth/social construct IMO

The government has basically admitted that aliens are flying through our airspace at will. So in ufology what is real and what is not? Travis Walton? Betty and Barney Hill? Etc? Is there a connection to other phenomena? I used to say emphatically NO. But I can no longer say that. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke's_three_laws#The_laws Magic.

.........or if they're hungry. https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/article/lone-predatory-black-bears-responsible-most-human-attacks/2011/05/11/

Science is an ideology. Those in control of science are a cabal. The Earth is not flat, but many of the beliefs on Earth are very flat. What does it tell you? Do you disagree with the scientific consensus that there have been several different human species? If so, how so?

Hi there, found my way here from Reddit with a link to the bill Munns report, very interested to continue reading so I have subscribed. Cheers

It happens a lot. If you read through the new members introduction thread, you'll see that many of them mention becoming interested when they watched a show on cable.

Fine. Then make your own competing content that shows the benefits of the scientific method. Make it understandable and accessible for someone unfamiliar with your proposed methods. Browbeating people online isn’t moving the needle in your favor. Most of these people never want to progress past the ‘posting funny Bigfoot memes’ stage. Those that do want to progress… give them the opportunity to discover your information.

I tend to believe that sasquatches are what they are and nothing I can think or say will change what they are, so I tend to not put them in a box. Having said that, I lean towards a flesh and blood creature with special talents and attributes. Bioluminescent eyes and infrasound being a couple of them. There is a lot of wooy things that one encounters that turn out to be more natural and normal than what it seemed. Then on the other hand some really unexplained bizarre things happen that just freaks a person out. I also tend to believe that anecdotal evidence wether mundane or wooish should be looked at when trying to understand the whole of the phenomenon.

Very sad to see this. I followed the Bigfoot thread on Arkansas Hunting forum for years due to his participation. I always looked forward to reading his replies. Interesting stories and reports in a extremely long thread.

So, I had a buddy in high school (Stone Age, pre cell phones), I’d call his house to plan mischief and mayhem in the summer. Invariably I’d call when his mother was watching her “stories” and she’d be annoyed at answering the phone. She would tell my buddy “ some Ed is on the phone for you “ even though she knew me… we thought it was hilarious so “SumEd” was born.

That is exactly my point. But try telling that to some of the long time members here.

And my merely pointing that out is worthy of a downvote? You reveal yourself.

Pass the ranch dressing.

I am the arbiter. If you don’t like it, there’s the door.

That my friend is why you are not a lawyer or a scientist.

Vocals by the beaver pond by the nests.

Are you sure it was a bear and not aliens?

You know squat, you are going by a very likely imperfect historical record, so please. Until you have a sequenced genome of all classes of humanish offshoots all you are doing in your assumptions rather than basing opinion as fact is embellishment.

Downvotes by the abrased... truth is truth... oh well...