Leaderboard

My point here is just to show one can assume the intention of an 'animal' but can't really know. That is all. We might say, "Bigfoot is a kind creature since it threw rocks at me and missed intentionally" I am saying we have no way to know if they were gunning for you and just missed. We assume it was missing by intention and that attributes many things to how they might think. I can equally say maybe the handful of people every year who get lost in the woods were attacked and killed by a sasquatch. I don't think so but my point is, how can we know? Again, we make assumptions and then fill in the blanks. 1) do we even know such a rock was thrown by a bigfoot 2) Do we know they are such a good aim their intention wasn't to hit or kill you? I think a lot of people read into many things and just attribute them to bigfoot. If they do this enough then a picture is drawn of what they think Bigfoot might be. How many times has Bobo or these others on TV talked about Bigfoot to the point they seem to know what Bigfoot's favorite color is and what Bigfoot's favorite baseball team is. <Snap twig> - "that must be a squatch!" Rocks are thrown and it is a promising sign that makes sense to me it could be a bigfoot to consider provided certain factors are met. When I say, "Maybe they were aiming at you and missed" I don't necessarily think that. I am trying to show we have no idea. We assume what is the truth. I could say, "These rocks are being hurled by a slingshot used by Bigfoot" Am I wrong? Why am I any more incorrect than if i said they were thrown by hand? Look we know under unusual circumstances in some of these cases people have experienced a rock or rocks thrown at them. Each situation is different. We need to try to figure out why. I would be more satisfied if someone had photographed some footprints like Bluff Creek 1967 and then hours later report something threw rocks at them.

Hi, my name is Anita and I'm the founder of Ohio Valley Region Bigfoot Research, based in Tuscarawas County, Ohio. We research and investigate Bigfoot sightings in and around the OVR.

Hello I'm Jim from Illinois. I've taken an interest in big foot after listening to the sasquatch chronicles podcast. My goal is to learn more and pass the time at work. Thanks to the community

I’ve seen elk prints and that’s no elk print? I’ve killed bears they don’t have heads like that or arms longer than their body? If those are costumes they are really good ones.

Hello hello!!! Mike Casey here and excited to be a part of this!! Recently moved to Washington and eager to get out into some locations, hoping for some guidance and help from people who’ve been in the field for a while, if not that’s ok too!!! Here for some adventure and to seek out this amazing WHATEVER IT MAY BE!!!!!!! Thank you:)

Saw on Bigfoot's Reflection where Dr. Binderagel said something like: Science isn't looking at this, it is running/ looking the other way. Adding this interview here you posted it seems to support that view. He seems to be saying, "Why are you looking into this if you are a serious scientist." This outlines some pressure some in that group must feel. I think it was Grover Kranz who said, "My university supports by research in the sense they agree not to fire me" Dr. B being going is a loss.

Since we are dreaming.1967 Bluff creek October 20th with Patterson and Gimlin. Also with Lord Hunt in the Nepal.

My name is Jon. I live in Eastern idaho an hour and a half from both Jackson, Wyoming and Yellowstone. We are about3 hours from Sun Valley. (Which I like better than Jackson.) I have spent most of my life living in Northern California or Eastern Idaho. I teach high school history and other topics. I am like a utility infielder. I am pushing 60. I have 5 daughters, a wonderful wife, 2 Alsatians, and my girls are all married to pretty great guys. All of 10 of whom are a lot sharper than me. I graduated from BYU in 1989, then from graduate school in 1993. Thank you for letting me join.

All of them since they lasted so long even though there’s so many new ones that just don’t get the attention they had.

I don't think they are aiming to hit people. If they wanted to hurt or kill you, they would use bigger rocks or do it themselves. As a big, intelligent mammal, I would think Sasquatch knows what can hurt them and what cannot. It would make sense that they know humans are dangerous and unpredictable, especially if they evolved alongside us over the eons. Throwing a rock in a general direction toward someone should be enough to scare them off to avoid confrontation. Even if it did not and the human started confrontation, I think the Sasquatch would flee. Why risk your life when you are big and fast and can run away from something that you know is dangerous? Just my opinion on the matter from an ecological standpoint.

I did some volunteer work several years ago for a big cat recue sanctuary, they had over 70 big of every type, and some were fairly tame. One of my favs was Sasha, a black leopard, she could get squirrely, and jumped me one time....the moment she charged me and jumped from about 15' away towards my head tapped a primal fear I have never experienced before or since.....here she is.

Who/ What threw the rocks? Makes sense to me if a person is in some really deep wilderness, there are few if any people around to be the thrower. It is a given 'rocks' are normally thrown by people. Does this mean if a rock is thrown the assumption should be a human person was the thrower? I say yes unless proven otherwise. What animal can really throw a rock? Deer, racoons and so on are off the list of possible rock throwers. I'm not trying to say those who think Bigfoot threw the rock are wrong. When I was a kid I remember hikers walking below us in the woods. My friends and I quietly threw a few rocks down at these hikers taking great care not to throw too close as to hit them with the rock. Doing so could have injured or even killed them. That didn't stop us as we were kids. They couldn't see us but we could see them. After they left the area we moved on. They likely left saying, "Someone threw some rocks at us." They could have also said, "Some Bigfoot creature threw some rocks at us." How do you prove them wrong. What is really the difference? The main factor between the human thrower and any potential Bigfoot thrower is just how remote the area is. Put another way, Can those who think Bigfoot threw the rock admit they would be less likely to think this if the woods in question were a well-traveled area?

Watched it over the weekend and thought it was really well done. It approaches the topic from a very human, emotional/personal perspective rather than the usual sensationalized and speculative route. I'm curious what folks think of the story and very clear photos taken from a small plane near St. Mary's, Alaska. This segment is near the end of the film. I suspect somebody here in the forum community knows more about this incident than I do.

@BRB Thanks for your review and it appears to be a good thermal for the money. A quick question. The AGM Taipan TM15-384 has a native magnification of 1.5 while the TM-19 is 1.9 and the TM-25 is 2.5. The one offered by the BFRO, from the specs posted earlier, appears to have a digital zoom of 1.0-4.0x but doesn't list the native magnification. I assumed it was 1.0 but I can't find any confirmation of that number. Any thoughts?

VA i can assure you, soooooo many are absolute garbage. I don't blame him/them for not posting them.

I suspect that they've culled the best or most promising ones first with the rest sitting in a bin to be reviewed at a later date. Anyone one of us could go through a pile of a hundred reports and determine quickly which ones were of interest and which ones were not.

One time I was in the woods and had a huge rock thrown at my car but I’m pretty sure it was maybe Native Americans mad that I was on there reservation. I never hiked there again because they were scarier than Bigfoot.