Leaderboard

I have met the film makers and have been squatching with them. I thoroughly enjoyed the time spent with them. They put out a statement... I have not watched the unedited video, but I think she was hoaxed... That picture is a suit.

A choice bit of merch just a couple of miles from my house

The news said he was a deer hunter it also said in the story it was a fruity deer bait. The first on the scene to investigate was Director of IT for the Roman Catholic Church and Bigfoot investigator shown here standing in the same spot as the creature. They reduced his size and placed him over top of the thing. His limbs should be longer but they are much shorter.

I was really enjoying it, until the last segment with the Utah/Alaska family. That entire part felt too long, and then to see the obvious (IMO) hoax? I think the ex staged it. And if I were one of the other persons who shared their experience I'd be upset, because I believe that last segment will make many question the entire film. I think that the rest of the documentary was excellent, and it was an emotional experience to watch. Very moving stories, and genuine people sharing them.

Dr. Mayor expanded on this unique discovery. "Finding what appears to be a very large structure, seemingly created with intention and requiring great strength as well as foresight, is interesting. It is not unheard of for primates to stack sticks or rocks, although for me, the jury is still out as to what that was. There is no guess work in science. It is great is that eDNA was collected from that site. That may give us the answers we are looking for." I know @hiflier contacted Dr. Mayor months ago when he was researching his eDNA project... Miroslava Munguia Ramos, project manager at the UCLA California Environmental DNA program, has analyzed the eDNA sample from the tree structure. Following are her observations. "We received soil samples from your team and took a few months to get them processed. What we’re looking at are the unique organisms that we were able to identify. Our software does what’s known as metabar coding. So, it’ll match up all the DNA sequences that we were able to detect and try to cross reference them with the thousands of genomes that have been published and it’s pretty common that when we’re looking at environmental DNA samples, we detect humans, because there’s going be human traces almost everywhere." "But what I found very interesting was that, yes, we have detected human DNA in these areas, but we’re still seeing different primate DNA. There wasn’t just one human primate, there are several different primates, some sort of primate relative that exists in the data." "Pan troglodyte is a species of chimpanzee, which you would not see in the areas you’re at. It’s a real head scratcher. It’s important to note that the higher the detection, the more confidence we can say that whatever organism, whatever taxonomy we’re looking at was apparent in the area. And in this case, we’re looking at the Pan genus, or the chimpanzee genus…. there’s 3000 reads." "The technology is constantly improving, it’s getting more accurate, and now it just really comes down to making sure we have enough samples and we’re confident that whatever we’re studying is a unique species."

https://www.travelchannel.com/shows/expedition-bigfoot/articles/expedition-bigfoot-exciting-dna-find

Still a bear and nothing else!

Eyewitnesses pegged these two as the drivers ...

In that case I am a fan. I am glad it helps you.

Yes. they shake trees. https://www.google.com/search?q=bear+shaking+tree&oq=bear+shaking+tree+&aqs=chrome..69i57.5481j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 Viral vid of the two men working out with the bear cracks me up.

Utilize the thousands of trails, forestry roads, and secondary roads that already run through habitats, and the thousands of already established primitive campsites. Many already do this and still there are sighting reports and encounters of all kinds day and night. How many times have people said they weren't ready for that perfect photo or video, or even audio, when their encounters occurred, or that road crossing happened. But if they were, then we'd have tons of images and videos just form people being in normal places. A footprint along a road or trail is just as good as one three miles in. No remote footprints, and they are indeed found, has led to proof so far. Those prints say the same thing as prints that are more local- that a BF was there but is no longer. And then active areas that are newly discovered go dormant. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to put all of this together with the experiences at the nesting sites to figure out what's going on. The common denominator is that our presence isn't appreciated. even areas that people say are continually active and shows signs of presence haven't produced much of anything. I truly think that deep research into habitat is counterproductive. A recent study miles into remote locations north of British Columbia deployed hundreds of camera traps over many square kilometers and caught just about every animal one could thing of- except the one we're interested in. I will bring in some data and maps on that in a little while. I'd also like to talk more about the purpose of the study.