Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/16/2022 in all areas

  1. The possibilities so far seem to be, in order of probability: 1 - juvie squatch 2 - chimp (which is certainly a possibility, as norsman proved with those links to exotics caught on trail cams) 3 - a flexible mange bear with beautiful black fur For those that say it's improbable that it's a chimp in that area and it's a bear, how probable is it a squatch making a mistake and caught on camera? We have two possibilities that are both infrequent, yet have precedent. I'm also curious as to any weighting being given to the improbability of it being a bear. Example: "it's a bear!" but it doesn't look like a bear "it's a bear with mange!" but it doesn't look like a bear, and mange has been ruled out "it's a bear, because what would a chimp be doing in PA?" norseman had links to just a few examples of animals being where they weren't supposed to be "it's a bear, because other bears were caught on camera!" those were cubs, and look nothing like the subject "it's a bear, dammit!!!" OK, but why does that have a higher probability than an exotic or a juvie squatch? It's the same line of thinking where you ask if moose tracks prove a moose is in the area.. "Yes!" Do deer tracks prove deer are in the area? "Yes!" Do bear tracks prove if bear are in the area? "Yes!" Do squatch tracks prove squatch are in the area? "NO!!!!!!!!!!"
    2 points
  2. My cousin that used to go with me moved to Ohio so I don"t have anyone to go with. I am not comfortable going out in the area without someone else a lot of it has no cell service. So if someone is interested that is on the site let me know. Thanks I have a 4x4 you can send me a msg
    1 point
  3. OMG my family have hunted deer in this area for three generations. Even if this was filmed on the Antone, that does not mean they are not having encounters. Although I don’t know why they would lie about location. It makes you wonder what else they are lying about. My dad would kill me if I named the area we hunted so I won’t. But our camp had some squatchy experiences in that mountain range. No sightings but lots of sign. Many trees broken in half, markers. One strange thing I’ve never seen before was multiple areas where it looked like massive human turds but on bushes. He was pooping on these sage brush bushes that were like three feet tall. Too tall for a dog/bear.
    1 point
  4. When we walked Todd to the clinic in town to get stitches, the doctor was very certain that it was a dog bite and scolded us for tall tales. Later she called Todd's mom to apologize for not believing us. Turns out a young adult and my neighbor , who was an elderly gentleman, got bit too and they corroborated our story of what we thought was a baboon. The authorities were called and in the end, Todd's mom was renting one of her houses to a man who was secretly keeping 3 Japanese pig tailed macaques and one got loose. It kept running to humans for safety because it was scared and humans not wanting a "baboon" jumping on them would fight it off causing it to defend its self.
    1 point
  5. I'll say. A variety of wildlife willing to pose for the camera. What percent of the bears in your area would you say are cinnamon colored?
    1 point
  6. Lots of action at that site!
    1 point
  7. Hi Vinchyfoot! Goodbye Vinchyfoot.
    1 point
  8. I totally respect and encourage everyone’s opinion no matter what it is. Since the very beginning BFRO just wanted to find the truth unlike those that labeled it a bear just because they don’t believe in Bigfoot. The first was the Pennsylvania Game Commission that said just last week it was “unfortunate they haven’t been able to get a sick bear photo that looks like the Jacobs photos”. Hundreds of sick bears over 15 years of looking tells me this was not a bear.
    1 point
  9. Why wishful thinking? Do I care if Pennsylvania has a rogue Chimp running around its forests? Ummmm no. Besides the fact it looks like a Chimp and not a Bear? There is Chimp DNA found in eastern forests in Kentucky. That’s fact. Anyone who claims the photos look like a Bear? Are just playing the odds game. Yes I’m well aware that black bears out number anomalies in eastern forests. And yet here we are. I’ve shot, gutted, skinned numerous Bears. I’ve even packed one out on Joker my mule. Huntster lives in Alaska and has hunted both species of Bear. He says it’s not a Bear. What are your credentials?
    1 point
  10. The edge of that green patch is 20 miles from Central Park in New York City. At that distance, you can hear the cab drivers honking their horns. I'd go out on a limb here and suggest that looking for a sasquatch in that patch of woods would likely be a waste of time.
    1 point
  11. That's the storyline, but I'm more skeptical than ever before. I suppose I've come to distrust unproven science, especially when it comes to such wild claims like that and how such claims are used as tools to manipulate our behaviors and economic activity. Taking 250' of ocean level around the planet, turning it to ice, then stacking that on the land surfaces while simultaneously leaving your new, magical, arctic "land bridges" ice free (not to mention the tropics and sub-tropics) is quite a trick.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...