Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/18/2022 in all areas

  1. I did watch the entire video. Then I watched the video you linked again. Looked and sounded like the first time, and again, I heard absolutely nothing about an eyewitness at the Jacobs site. Nothing. Nada. Zip. Maybe you can cite the minute/second point where that is said? Got a reference to that publication, please?
    1 point
  2. There is a wealth of information in this Michael Mayes book. Much more is available in NAWAC's Ouachita Project Monograph, NAWAC pdcasts and news releases, and NAWAC newsletters. I know of no other organization that approaches the careful documentation and ready release of information that NAWAC provides (and that analysis includes THE BIG ONE). For anyone interested attached is a jpg (flat file to guard against imbedded info) of a word file that addresses the five failed NAWAC attempts to collect a wood ape specimen (the file also sheds some light on "hard" versus "soft" wood ape sightings and the fact that only 5 attempts have been made in 50,000+ man hours of trying).
    1 point
  3. Accepted. I've already scheduled my eye exam for early November, and I'm admittedly WAY overdue. I have insurance coverage, so just the co-pay & deductible will be accepted. Thanks!
    1 point
  4. I disagree completely. The PG film is a motion picture with scores of frames showing front, back, and right side of the subject.......in motion. It was analyzed by well recognized experts for 50 years now. There were footprint casts poured at the scene, and they match others poured in the region previously. Two men witnessed the creature with their eyes at the filming. Other parties visited and analyzed the scene over the subsequent 10 days, also seeing and photographing the footprints. People visit and analyze the site to this day, half a century later. There is no valid comparison whatsoever.
    1 point
  5. Please don't. I recant. You're obviously free to invest all you wish into that pic and all others like it, and I encourage you to give it your all. Do not let it go. Sink your teeth into it like a pit bull. Please keep us informed on what you glean from that investment.
    1 point
  6. I think researching the details in the evidence is fun and eye opening for everyone. For many years now like the PGF the Jacobs photos held up to the scrutiny and even sometimes foul play to this day. If you believe Bigfoot is of flesh and blood and not some spiritual being this may be the clearest evidence of their young.
    1 point
  7. This photo is a hoax. It was taken in a room. If you go back on the video to the time stamp 2:08 and pause. You will see the shadows of the leaves on a drywall. As the flash goes off on the camera. I am not buying it. Hoax.
    1 point
  8. 7:00 mark. Eastern forests have some weird crud going on. It’s either a Hoax or ape. NOT A BEAR! rn
    1 point
  9. I got to thinking about if a mic would fit into a cable gland. I first tried a #9, it fit perfectly. But I couldn’t recess the mic into the gland. A #11 worked great! With a bit of patience, I was able to slightly angle the mics. The box is waterproof, and the mics should stay out of the rain. The angle of the box put the mics pointed downward slightly also.
    1 point
  10. Hi Vinchyfoot! Goodbye Vinchyfoot.
    1 point
  11. I’ve never once introduced Bigfoot into the discussion as a hypothesis. Try again. Again I will ask you? Why is it a Bear? I would say your armchair all the way if you have never bear hugged one to get it on a mule. Or had the hide off one. It’s not a Bear for numerous reason blatantly obvious in the photo. But keep screaming Bear I’m sure I will change my mind!🙄
    1 point
  12. It's a juvenile sasquatch in a mangy bear suit!!!
    1 point
  13. The story of Noah is a fairy tale.
    1 point
  14. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glacial_period Berengia has came and gone numerous times. With cross pollination happening both ways. Horses went one way and elephants came the other way, etc, etc. If we go far enough back in time? Antarctica was a temperate forest full of marsupials. One survivor that will probably never return to it home. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothofagus_moorei Science may not be right 100 percent of the time. But I fully accept that the earth is forever changing. Also, the flood, I see it as a story older than Noah. https://www.historywiz.com/flood.htm It was a glacial dam break like lake Missoula, involving the formation of the Black Sea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis We are in the weeds here…. Is it possible that something got to North America before modern humans? I say absolutely.
    1 point
  15. It’s not. The strategy is to shoot yer buddy……then RUN!🤣
    1 point
  16. The book sounds interesting. Thanks for sharing. The lack of proof is certainly not unexpected. It is a very difficult task to prove the existence of creatures that most likely don't exist. The ape canyon story is a good one. A cool campfire yarn.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...