Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/22/2022 in all areas

  1. ^^^ This. I don't bother with most bigfoot movies because you know it's fiction, and once you see a few, they're pretty much the same. Harry and the Hendersons was quite different, since it was produced as a comedy, and it was a pretty good one. Sighting videos and pics deserve a look. The vast majority turn out to be either nothing but a dark hole in foliage with a red circle drawn around it, or something like the Jacobs pic; an animal in an interesting pose which ellicits excitement, but which will turn out to be nothing of import. The photographic evidence to really take stock in is that which comes with supporting evidence: multiple on-site witnesses, casted footprints, hair samples, motion picture over still photo, etc. Even then, as the PG film has proven without question, it will "prove" (as defined by the skeptic and science industries) absolutely nothing. But such photographic events, depending on how current, does provide opportunity to find more trace evidence, data, and the possibility for more encounters with prepared researchers. This is here the BFRO came in with the Jacobs photo event. IMHO, it was conducted with much fanfare, which made it poorly done, and it likely provided little more but additional manufactured reports, which soiled previous reports, and mass media exposure for the organization.
    2 points
  2. 🙄 It could certainly be a hoax. It’s certainly NOT a Bear…. But why would a Bigfoot be all seeing and all knowing and never allow itself to be filmed? Obviously if real whatever it is? Doesn’t know he is there. Humans have been sneaking up on things and stabbing it to death for millions of years. And that probably includes other apes.
    2 points
  3. Older video but a good one. I actually really like this video and find it pretty compelling. Being stationed and living in the south setting in that water is a bad idea for many reasons. So I don't see it being a guy in a suit personally. But I'm open to being wrong if someone comes out saying they hoaxed it.
    2 points
  4. In the backstory the person filming this creature was settled in, being very still and waiting for hogs and not sneaking up on anything. I am assuming he has done this before and apparently this works with hogs so why not another wild creature? Is it possible for an animal to be so focused on what it is doing or eating that it may not notice another? Is it possible a younger less experienced animal may be more focused and less observant? Or a sick one? Could still be a pretty good hoax, too. I do agree with those that say any video or photo would not likely be accepted by the general scientific community as proof but it does indicate where to take a closer look for better evidence.
    1 point
  5. Well. Every photo and video of a undocumented ape man could be a hoax. Two arms, two legs and a head. If we chose to ignore all media because it could be a hoax? It would be crickets chirping here at our forums. With that said, we must remember that photos and video will never prove anything to science.
    1 point
  6. The initial thread has bankrupted me. You were right and I should have listened. Now I have a garage full of all these MK Davis Sasquatch videos and it may have been a hoax.
    1 point
  7. Same here. I would love the isolation, but I'd be face down in two weeks in some creek with a grizzly gnawing on me.
    1 point
  8. There is a big difference between great and infallible. Zero? Not hardly. It’s a part of our evolution. Africans kill and eat baboons and apes with archery equipment right now. Well at least I got you to admit it’s not a Bear…
    1 point
  9. This is the Mississippi Skunk Ape video, and as Skinwalker mentioned, it's been around a while. This tells more about the background. It says it was filmed nine miles west of Tunica, MS. That distance west of Tunica would be very close to the Mississippi River. https://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2013/10/breaking-mississippi-man-films-skunk.html
    1 point
  10. This is one of the videos I find hard to be a hoax. The sound of the wood breaking, even if it is dead, is quite loud. Whatever is ripping the bark off has pretty good strength, in my opinion. I know some have said they see a youngster hanging around the adult in the bushes, but I do not see it. Either way, I also believe this to be convincing. ThinkerThunker has analyzed this one- he does pretty well overall with his analyses.
    1 point
  11. Really enjoyed it Norseman. Even though they did not see nothing. We all had a chance to discover what they did on their travels. Since everything is big in Alaska. They have to be the Apex in that wilderness. Just my opinion. I wish I could live in that type of wilderness, but I would die along with my family. Being that I am a city dweller. There is no room for my type there. I just enjoy these types of Documentaries.
    1 point
  12. ......,or that they're constantly being harassed by grizzlies.........
    1 point
  13. Yep, that is where I was going with the comment but chose not to be direct to see if anybody else noticed.
    1 point
  14. I have seen this video before. Thanks for sharing. Not convincing. Any self respecting man ape would probably not allow a human to stand there and record it. When the film subject gets up the person pans away quickly and runs. No doubt hoaxed, but not bad.
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...