Leaderboard

Not really. Patterson and Gimlin specifically went to Bluff Creek because of the many reports in that area, and tyey had that camera both hoping to get footage of the creature, and filming documentary footage. They weren't just wandering about in any forest and carrying a camera for no reason at all. Actually, there is new footage all the time, especially game cam pics. The problem is that they are either lousy quality, known animals in strange poses, or outright hoaxes. In the end, it really doesn't matter. More photographic evidence will accomplish nothing more than increased rancorous debate, something the world is already overfilled with regarding every topic under the sun.

There are plenty of compelling (to me anyway) thermal images, and you can search them up with very little effort. What they won't do is convince anyone whose default setting is "Bigfoot can't exist, therefore it doesn't". Or anyone on the fence either, probably. A thermal heat signature image is weird and fantastic looking to begin with, and any degree of skepticism is only enhanced by that. My take is that plenty of researchers have plenty more images that document what they know they experienced, but they also know that nothing will be gained by those being published. A thermal blobsquatch is still a blogsquatch.

University of California professor. 1936. He probably had a direct role in the future of the California university system.

Right. If what you say is true, they're not flesh and blood creatures.