Leaderboard

Attached herewith please find the Paul Freeman filmsite. He shot video of one subject but on camera he wonders if there are two Bigfoot. I visited the filmsite in July 2022, just shy of the 30th anniversary of the video. The most astonishing thing to me is that after almost three decades of time the place was easily recognizable. Not so with the P-G filmsite. The video was taken in the morning on August 20, 1992, often incorrectly noted as 1994. Photos courtesy and copyright © Daniel Perez, 2022. A full write up on the matter in the current edition of my newsletter. The photo of the road sign is where you turn to go down to Deduct Spring, Oregon, often called Deduct Springs and sometimes written as Deduck Spring. Daniel Perez www.bigfoottimes.net

@norseman this is a fascinating video. Our family had the chance to have a behind the scenes tour of the Natural History Museum years ago when our kids were small. I worked for a company and the grandson of the company's founder had donated a lot of stuff to the museum, hence the opportunity we were afforded. The museum itself is super easy to get lost in...go behind the scenes into the basement and oh my, it is crazy complex. I especially liked the part about collecting dinosaur bones. It was clear that the curator LOVES the bones in the collection, something that I hope would/will be the case when bones representing type specimens of our favorite creature are represented in this collection some day. Thanks for sharing the vid, Norse, much appreciated, I would likely not have come across it without your help.

I'm not saying it's aliens......but it's Aliens

I'll give you credit for imagination and persistence. However, it's not close to proving anything to anyone who isn't already convinced. It does not move the needle one iota, not for science, not for scoftics, not even for intelligent skeptics. Not even for this knower who remains a skeptic of the photo. I also don't consider "bear" or "chimp" proven. As I've said, it's an ambiguous photo. Even eventual proof of sasquatch will not validate the Jacobs photo as a photo of sasquatch any more than proof of sasquatch will validate a picture of a box of corn flakes as a photo of sasquatch. It has always fallen short in the past. It falls short today. It will always fall short in the future. The Jacobs photo is not a hill to die on so far as proof of bigfoot. Personal advice, one enthusiast to another: your time would be better spent in the field gathering new evidence instead of flogging a long dead horse 'cause that horse is not going to budge. I don't think you'll heed it but I'm offering it anyway. Best o' luck out there ... MIB

But that wasn't the question.

David Paulides has at least a number of the original Paul Freeman casts, and some of them are presently on loan to, and displayed at, the Sasquatch Outpost Museum in Bailey, Colorafo.

"'Government knowing' in the real world" means infinitely more than what will be found in any new employee orientation manual. The storyline on Lyle Laverty, whether speculative, third person, or openly admitted in interviews, is a case in point. Here we have a man who, in the early years of his federal career, was eyeball deep in sasquatchery, including the most convincing photographic capture of these creatures (the PG film), was reported to have had a personal sighting, and was reported to have found a nest (in the close proximity of the PG film site), and who later rose in rank to hold a cabinet level position in the Department of the Interior for Fish Wildlife and Parks. This is proof positive of "government knowing" at the nearly highest level.........yet even among the most active of public sasquatch advocacy, few know of this. Why? Because nobody (including, and perhaps mostly Mr. Laverty) wants that to be common knowledge. Secrets. They're the breakfast cereal of government. It's what they live on. What they feed on. Their stock in trade. Everything they know, they will hide, scramble, or use to manipulate others.

Welcome to the BFF PharmaPhriend! I hope you enjoy the forums.

I see above the biggest misconception about what it took to get the PG footage. These were not some Wahoo cowboys wandering around the woods and just by happenstance glommed onto a Sasquatch while coincidentally holding a camera. They were highly prepared, had trained for it, had thought through the process and were ready when the opportunity presented itself. Yes, they were extremely lucky, and it is the unlikelihood of them being that fortunate that still to this day clouds the enormity of what they achieved. But what is it they say about the lucky and the prepared?