Efficiency. If we come across content, or a video, or whatever evidence, that's unanimously downranked, then I wouldn't spend much time looking at it. For example, if we had a rating of video evidence, P/G would likely get a high rating, signaling it's credible and worthy of some attention. If it's a researcher or an "authority", like say Meldrum, and has a higher rating, I'm more apt to pay closer attention to his data.
Im taking exception to Dave’s post.
If a body wont convince people so why bother? What is a rating system gonna do!?🤷🏻♂️
If people are not convinced with a body? Who cares? They become flat earthers at that point. This is how biology works. Sorry.
Brian, that should be a very capable rig. The Rubicon comes with some very useful offroad gear, like locking diffs and extra low axle and transfer case ratios. I hope your area of Fla wasn't too badly torn up by that latest hurricane.