Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/26/2022 in all areas

  1. I struggle watching this guy. I'm thinking he's just seen an angle with Isdahl and is attempting to re-create, and i'm also thinking his way of story telling is in-tune with his imagination, over an encounter that's been shared with him and i say that as if you watch his body language and the eyes, he's reaching inside his own head to describe x and y instead of actually relaying what's been given to him. That then increases the element of doubt about it all. Not for me.
    2 points
  2. ^Right, also BigTex and probably others on here. I wrote in 2016: I think many field science people in general are probably stumbling over BF evidence without awareness and ascribing it to other events. They can't help that, of course. Awhile back in my area, I read news about a study of stream habitat ecology, and there was a quote that made me laugh. It was something about "we know there are kids playing in (numerous streams) because we see their footprints all the time".
    1 point
  3. He is now the third person to report finding small foot prints in out of the way cold season places. Will has reported it in the Colville NF in Washington. And Madison and Northwind have reported it in Oregon. This guy found them in the Plumas NF in California. For me? That’s an interesting discovery. How many Sasquatch tracks are being overlooked because people are looking for massive tracks? Sasquatch are not born 800 lbs.
    1 point
  4. Comments below that tik-tok mention that it's at a sanctuary compound of some sort, so they're habituated rescue bears, essentially tame.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...