Leaderboard

I feel like PGF champions are some of the worst critics of other evidence. It’s like they are defending the PGF from the competition or something. My film is awesome and yours is trash! While I will admit that the Jacobs photo is ambiguous. (It’s also obviously not a normal Bear photo) If Patty was a real creature? She comes from a species of real creatures. Right? That means there is NO WAY that only one has been caught on film in 60 years! I run trail cameras as a hobby. There are tons and tons of crummy photos showing deer back sides, blurry birds, branches blowing in the wind. Etc. I don’t keep those because they are not clear photos. The Jacobs photos isn’t blurry. It’s not a half photo. 🤷‍♂️ I think we can do well to keep an open mind in the face of this mystery. I stand by my statement that no photo will prove anything. But I can assure you that if that showed up on my trail camera? I dang sure would go scour the area! Is it intriguing? Absolutely!

Then sasquatches simply don't exist.

Still my position: If I had a $20 bill in jacket I did not know I had, I would put $10 on Patty, $5 on a hoax and keep the last $5. If I am on a jury the case made proving the PGF being a hoax has not been made.

I think the twigs and leaves are creating pareidolia. I think we're looking at the back of the head as the creature is moving away. Since we can see shoulder slope on the left, I don't think it's a bear.

The way I read BD’s post, I agree with him. I take his post about clear and unclear refers to the content in said film. What is the actual subject of the film. A bipedal creature vs an ambiguous potentially bipedal “creature” Norse, your take on his post seems to be in regards to clarity and resolution. I think your take, while accurate, is missing the meaning BD attempted to convey. I may be completely wrong however. 🤷🏻