Leaderboard

Buck leaves. Cougar enters. Camera fired alittle quick.

Ah, back on topic. Probably not. I think your suggestion is on track. I think you have to get DNA samples "somehow" and get them in the hands of enough credentialed scientists to draw interest and research dollars. Enough scientists from enough places that it would be difficult to subvert them all simultaneously. Come up with your list of labs to do testing. Keep that list to yourself. Spilling it here or anywhere else opens up the possibility of someone, if there is a someone, monitoring you and "heading you off at the pass" by contacting your labs ahead of time and telling them what results to report back to you. I think the combination of enough DNA samples and maybe supporting photographs / video in enough different hands is the most probable way of cracking the puzzle. You're not going to prove it directly yourself but you might attract enough resources to get it done.

That's what I was afraid you were saying. :( I'm disappointed in you. You should know better than "going there." ==> You can't prove a negative. The strongest negative statement they could make is that they .. the individual speaking, not even their agency .. are not aware of proof of existence.

This UFO admission has occurred literally simultaneously with the creation of the Space Force. Congress, get to funding............ Catch a sasquatch live and release it in the U.S. Capitol. Do it next January 6th.

I agree with all of that and if it there was a coverup I’d guess it’s along the lines you speak, disrupting mans origin. I’d put that above all the other possible reasons such as ppl not visiting National Forests or needing to protect the land. It would be bible thumpers pushing the coverup. As with anything there will be people on both sides pushing their agendas.

Thanks for your response. After the UFO cover up was exposed. One of the reasons given for the cover up was that UFO’s were seen by some in the government as a demonic presence. I don’t want to get us in trouble per forum rules. But I could see where a archaic hominid currently walking the Earth may rattle a few cages. Maybe. It wouldn’t rattle mine. Truth is truth and it should be first and foremost the top priority. Ultimately? Nothing anymore would surprise me with my government. We can take this to the tar pit if we like.

Honest question. The government denied the existence of UFO’s for a long time. Swamp gas, Jupiter, mass delusion, etc. The whole subject was laughed at by science. Now? The government has admitted that they are studying the phenomenon with all seriousness. NASA has jumped on board as well. So the precedence has been set before for government cover up. So why can’t it be happening right now with other phenomena? Ive struggled with the reasoning behind the why? Obviously advanced technology has security issues attached to it. Unlike Bigfoot. Who knows. I suppose there could be reasons for a cover up. So I guess I would like to know how you square all of this. I respect your opinion and would honestly like to know.

So far, ditto. I see no evidence that any agency "knows", even internally, that bigfoot exists. In other words, no agency has an internal training or policy instructing their employees how to deal with a bigfoot report. In my area we have many millions of acres of national forest and BLM-managed lands. Employees of the two agencies in just this area number upwards of 500, maybe upwards of 1000, and none of them .. retirees included .. that I know, which is a **bunch**, have received any instruction regarding how react to a member of the public reporting bigfoot. The employees are left totally on their own. This also applies to people in the military stationed Fairchild AFB and JBLM over the years. As I've said before, SOME individuals working for various agencies surely have knowledge, but it is individual knowledge, not agency knowledge. There can be no conspiracy beyond a personal sense of need not to make waves that might interfere with promotions later. While some folks may assert that lack of recognition is "proof" of a coverup, I don't think that is valid. It appears to fall in with the scoftics logic suggesting lack of proof is proof of lack .. and we know better than that. Since we know better, we shouldn't emulate it no matter how much we'd like it to be true.

Kangaroos

https://www.iflscience.com/neanderthals-ambushed-hibernating-cave-bears-for-their-pelts-meat-and-to-steal-their-caves-46802 Reading this article, it caught my eye that they have found Thal tooth marks on bear bones. BTW should find it interesting there is a precedence here!

One more twist for you: you shoot Bigfoot and kill it either … 1) because Bigfoot turned and attacked you so it was self defense or 2) you lie and say the Bigfoot you shot was trying to kill you and it was self defense.

Thanks for sharing. Wolves perhaps? Nevertheless, sounds eerily interesting.