Leaderboard

I reject that Patty was Homo Sapiens. She is not our species. It’s debatable on the genus. Either way her DNA should be very easily discernible from a modern Human. Unless, there is foul play.

Absolutely agree. And even if Homo? Not nearly as genetically close as Neanderthal (202 base pairs different) or Denisovan (about 600 base pair differences for Denisovan-1, and around 300 for Denisovan-3). Chimps are 1,600+base pairs away from us. My best guess is for the Sasquatch to be 900-1100 base pairs different. Genetically advanced Homo compared to Chimps, but still won't have our mutated brain genes. That profile seems to fit the creature's mannerisms, actions, and characteristics best. As a highly robust species in size, shape, and mobility, it still lacks our level of cognition. And, although they've had millions of years to get to where we are today brain-wise, they simple haven't arrived. Which is why we are the ones typing these posts and they aren't. They have a long, long way to go- if they ever get here at all.

Man shoots Bigfoot, tells no one. Gets turned in to authorities by lab. Rumors go through the BF community but no proof ever comes out. Public gets bored and forgets about it. Man shoots Bigfoot, makes announcement, no one believes him. Media picks it up. Follow up stories never happen. Public gets bored and forgets about it.....which is exactly what happened with the WA nest discoveries. It got announced in mainstream media and then disappeared.....with zero follow up.

My point of view has been well stated and well stated often. The Sasquatch is an amazing creature- just unbelievably amazing. That point gets diluted as we get more and more desensitized to the idea simply by reducing the incredible nature of the phenomenon in our discussions. I have never not been blown away watching that short snippet of Patty at the top of the BFF's home page. To think that something like that is really out there in our wildernesses is almost to much to contemplate. Why anyone would think that the Sasquatch is somehow so diminished in importance at an official level as to be either ignored or not thought of as an eye-opening, ground-breaking discovery possibility makes no sense. The creature, being what is, is in no way under the radar. Look at all the attention bears get. And yet the Sasquatch isn't equally, or more important, than bears?? I honestly do not understand that kind of a mindset. Again, my viewpoint has been well stated: This creature is monitored and there is no way that it isn't being monitored. It's huge in size, ancient, genetically very close to us, extremely rare, and would be a source of great knowledge that we could gain in so many areas of science if we were to study it. It should have been discovered easily by now. Period. Bottom line is government doesn't need to monitor researchers. They monitor the Sasquatch instead which covers all of the bases including keeping it physically isolated from us.. And they do it with the sophisticated, high tech capability that I've so often brought up- like the international migration satellite monitoring services of at least three companies. And my research takes that viewpoint even deeper than what I just wrote. It has been difficult to impress upon folks just how vitally important this creature really is. And, therefore, how vitally important it is to keep this creature undiscovered- which is even easier today with the tools and knowledge that the government has access to. Bears are important but the Sasquatch is, over the top, even more so. And that stark reality should never be diminished.

I think you both miss the point. It is not about whether YOU are anonymous. It doesn't matter whether you gather DNA samples or other things to test. It's not really about "intercepting." It is about going to the labs and telling them "it's in their best interest" to tell you the sample was bear regardless of what it actually was. What folks should keep silent about is where their samples will be tested if they are tested. The higher the profile the lab has, the less likely you are to get valid results back 'cause "they" have already visited that lab ahead of you.

Nice catch!

Buck leaves. Cougar enters. Camera fired alittle quick.

Bullwinkle is back. Trail cam hopefully is working but I got video of him and some deer he was bullying on my phone. Before I saw him I cut his track and where he urinated. Took a picture of a Bobcat track. He was hunting rabbits. Found a whitetail shed as well. IMG_4934.MOV