Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/02/2023 in all areas

  1. All that doesn't matter to Science. If the host isn't produced, it means nothing. Kinda' reminds me of what we used to say to the guy at work boasting about what he did or could do: if you don't have a pic, it didn't happen. Or kinda' like the jawbone found 39 years ago that only recently was declared as Denosivan.........after the sliver of finger bone from Denosiva cave was declare a new human species. https://www.science.org/content/article/first-fossil-jaw-denisovans-finally-puts-face-elusive-human-relatives Funny how that works: immediately after Science is forced to admit discovery, sasquatch relics will literally pour out of bone collections, old nightstand drawers, and native medicine bags everywhere.
    2 points
  2. Does it happen? Do agencies who must know about this creature monitor its whereabouts? The original UNIVAC computer was about the size of a one car garage and weighed around eight tons and sold for around 1.5 million bucks. And now we have phones than can do infinitely more, cost infinitely less, and fit in our pockets. Surveillance technologies followed suit and today we can only speculate how precise and powerful that technology is- not to mention it's potentially tiny component size. So. Is the Sasquatch under the federal/state microscope? Everything else in Nature, even the most mundane of things, already is, so why wouldn't this creature be as well considering its unbelievable characteristics? Weigh that against the fact that the Sasquatch is still an unrecognized species and one can only speculate as to the reason. I say the only reason no one tells the truth is money, because if I was government and that thing was in my back yard? You'd better believe I'd know about it. And I would know EVERYTHING I could possibly know about it by now: Where it is, what it's doing, how many there are, who's looking for it....EVERYTHING. Especially if I had more than enough of the technology available today to easily track it. The floor is open.
    1 point
  3. Hi I'm Melissa and reside in a small town begged Austin and Houston TX. My BF has been an in the cryptologic area for a while now. While I don't have any experience or encounters to note, I love reading or hearing about other's experiences.
    1 point
  4. Agreed. My point is that funding from the Science/industrial complex for sasquatchery doesn't exist. Funding essentially began with Tom Slick in 1956 and has remained at the same intensity and general origin ever since. Yes, individual maverick scientists have always been involved, in Russia before here, since the early-mid 20th Century, but at the industrial level, it is actually actively discouraged, and clearly ignored widely. This situation is clearly government in origin. When Eisenhower warned about the military/industrial complex, you'd better understand that includes Science in a HUGE way. As a career Army engineer, I'm here to tell you that military/science/engineering is in a forced marriage, and they live together in a very well funded mansion. The appendages of science that get the least attention from those guys get the least amount of the Big Money, and you'd better believe that most of that is intentional.
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-05:00
×
×
  • Create New...