Leaderboard

Indeed, Dr. Hart himself was invited to become a member here and there is a thread that was started to accommodate him and his work. He was the one who also came here and started that recent thread asking about thermal imagers. If you look him up here as "hvhart" you'll find everything he's discussed with us. He has articles on Dr. Meldrum's "Relect Hominid Inquiry" pages both here on this Forum as well as on the web. Dr. Hart also came out with his own book in the summer of 2020 (on Amazon) about Dr. Ketchum's study: "Sasquatch Genome Project: A Failed Study. I have two signed copies Chapter 16 of the book (also an eBook) is where that chart came from that I've posted across several recent threads. He's a very interesting guy who is continuing his work to this day.

That’s what I am saying. They now have the technology to tell a German and a Norwegian apart. Let alone a Japanese and a Congolese apart. Or a Moose and a Elk apart. So either they are? 1-Incompetent 2-Dishonest 3-The creature no longer exists in nature. Another point. Dr. Mayor, she found Chimp DNA in Kentucky. What does that mean? Does that mean Chimps are running around the forests of Kentucky? Does that mean the mystery creature is related to Chimps? Is this simply more Human contamination? Since Chimps and Humans are 98.9 % the same? It confuses and frustrates me that we can put away a murderer based on DNA left at a crime scene. And yet with undiscovered cryptids it’s broad strokes and nothing concrete. It’s also what drives me to grab a rifle and go look myself!🤨 Agreed.👍

It is a very interesting video. I've found something similar, what we call a nesting area. We find small areas all the time where deer or bear create a flattened down area in high grassy spots. It is obvious that is was something relatively small, but this one was huge. It was approximately 10'x10'. No clue what made it. We didn't find any hair or evidence of what possibly could have done it. A couple of years earlier, we did find moose tracks in the area, but even for a moose, that is huge. We found this in 2021, and is approximately 1/2 mile from where we found this print:

What is your favorite movie with Sasquatch and why? Mine is Sasquatch the legend of Bigfoot from 1976. I always enjoyed the scenery in this movie. I also enjoy the pace of the film. I remember watching this as a kid and that probably has a lot to do with it as well. A close second for me is the Legend of Boggy Creek. The new remastered 4k version is amazing to watch. I personally never enjoy watching the slasher type films with Sasquatch.

Welcome CatDaddy , davinal & r0nc00k !

http://patagoniamonsters.blogspot.com/2019/12/more-on-erectus-calvaria-from-chapala.html They said this wasn’t dug up in Mexico. Even though the owner said it was. Then the skull disappeared. https://www.8newsnow.com/news/i-team-world-famous-nevada-cave-may-harbor-dark-history/ Lovelock cave giants? Gone.

It has to come back as known, or the search would be warranted. That simply can't be allowed.

This. Every aspect of this phenomenon fits, too. Government simply will not allow widespread knowledge of these creatures until they benefit beyond their liability, and I see no possibility of that at all.........until they're extinct..........if that is even possible. If hybridization is possible (like Neanderthal/Denisovan), it will be suppressed even beyond de facto extinction.

They say it’s contamination. In the case of Dr. Mayor they said it was from Chimp pheromone chips. She said it’s not from that. It would be super helpful if the DNA results didn’t keep coming back as a KNOWN primate.

OH MAN! Your post would take a page to answer but I'll keep it as brief as possible. 1) No, it's not incompetence, 2) Dishonest in a way: Don't bring findings to the public, 3) The creatures definitely exist. YES! Dr. Mireya Mayor found Chimp DNA in an eastern Kentucky forest. But think about what I've been saying based on Dr. Hart's chart. Again, the mutations that are present are rare in Humans but COMMON IN OTHER PRIMATES. So, assuming that the chart is showing mutations present in Sasquatch DNA then those very same mutations would be in Chimps. And Gorillas, and Orangutans...The point I'm making is that there is no way that Dr. Mayor's test results would EVER say Sasquatch. And since Chimp DNA would have those same mutations as what's in Dr. Hart's chart? The "official" go-to answer for Dr. Mayor's results have to be be Chimp. But this is the way I think and have been thinking: For me it all goes together like this: Government knows; we are not allowed to know; Dr. Mayor came up with the same mutations and results as what's in Dr. Hart's chart....but no one will officially say Sasquatch as long as there is another well-known common animal to dump it all on. Point being: When Dr. Mayor's results were matched to the Genbank then what got spit out was Chimp....BECAUSE CHIMP DNA IS IN THE GENBANK AND NOT SASQUATCH DNA. So it was the only non-Human primate result that they could come up with. Trust me, I have turned this logic over ten way to Sunday and this scenario is the only thing that fits the picture. And it's been frustrating as crap. No wonder you want to keep on the road you've chosen. The fact is, I've reasoned out the truth of the situation. Good luck in laying it out in front of anyone who matters though. Because NO ONE is going to go against the government. Heck, then one could say that Dr. Hart's chart, which came from studying the SGP raw data, is showing that Chimps are living in the wild is other places , too, which makes no sense whatsoever! A Chimp DNA result is a perfect example for what happens to Sasquatch evidence......and there's always bears to fall back on if a physical Sasquatch specimen is ever acquired. That would end up going down the same common-animal road as DNA.

Or that the institution is strongly "suggested" to ignore. Because the more I get my head around stuff this the more I'm convinced that the Sasquatch DNA sequence anomalies have presented themselves to science constantly. Science isn't stupid when it comes to this stuff so, to me, this whole thing has been a rather serious matter for some time.

That was not my point. My point is is that if a Sasquatch and a Human lay in the grass in the same spot? Then the grass should have both species genetics waiting for collection. It’s not contamination. Otherwise every time an Elk or a Deer lays down in the same spot as a Sasquatch it would also be contaminated. Using this logic? Scientists would never be able to pull anything from EDNA. It would all be contaminated because the ecosystems is buzzing with thousands of species. It would be worthless. Im glad your study has found novel DNA. Is there any word on getting some movement from science on this?

Humanity itself is rife with strangeness.

Excellent question! Truth is, they don't really need to parse out anything at all, Norse. Everything has it's own DNA and will show up in the results. Typically science uses metabarcoding protocols which will pick up every organism in a sample whether the organism is large or small. By running a sample through a process called BLAST: https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi then ALL sequences in a sample will get matched to their respective organisms. Picking up Human DNA that is loaded with mutated anomalies can be part of those sample results. The rub is that most scientists will not be looking for those mutations even though they are present. It takes scientists actually being aware of the possibility of a Sasquatch in the mix to dig in further to see if an inordinate amount of rare mutations are not associated with normal Human DNA sequences in any of the GenBanks. The more mutations that are present the less chance that the sequence will line up with a normal Human genome. The bottom line here is that a scientist cannot simply disregard those mutations but actually be looking for those anomalies on purpose. And those types of scientists are more rare than the anomalies themselves, otherwise this creature would have been scientifically nailed down long ago. But since it has been my contention that government knows about this creature then I am certain that government already knows what Sasquatch DNA looks like.

Sacrilege! Heresy! Burn the infidel!