That is something I would greatly look forward to, sir. And I couldn't be more in agreement that the data "could" be correct, and I am indeed inclined to think that it is. But I also agree that, since Dr. Hart is not the source of the data, it can present a limiting level of scientific confidence. I thank you for your patience with me and I will wait to see if your and Dr. Hart's work can further support Table 22 in the future. If it can be, then hopefully, with so much riding on the outcome, it will be accepted by professional and citizen scientists alike- whether they be Sasquatch proponents or not.
I also think it was important for the Forum and its members to see this discussion and, for that reason, I am grateful our your dialogue. It's all good.