Leaderboard

Hello all. Jeremiah from the Bigfoot Society podcast here. I would love to do some interviews on the podcast with those that have had Sasquatch encounters during their research. Please feel free to send me a DM directly on this and I can provide more information. I have run this request by Gigantor first and he has approved this message.

This isn't really all that true...with hybrids it's much more a hit or miss kinda thing, and it can differ with every individual which traits manifest in the phenotype. Sure, dominant genes will usually ...well.....dominate the physical form, unless both parents possess recessive genes for a given trait, but there's no telling what combinations will prove beneficial or detrimental,or potentially lethal. Of course breeding between hybrids showing similar inherited traits stand a better chance of reinforcing those traits. And with humans there's also always the issue of social preference. Such as if with thal x sapes crosses , some get the big eyes and some dont, if those with the big eyes are socially deemed lesser, less desirable they might be killed(eaten?) Or at least find finding a mate unlikely, big eyes will gradually fall from the gene pool.

I suspect that government employees treat BF experiences much like we do. If a coworker is brave enough to say something about an experience you might share your own experiences with them on case by case basis. You certainly do not approach a boss who has some control about your job progression and start babbling about your BF experiences. At some point the agency managers are desk bound and unlikely to experience anything themselves. I made the mistake of sharing experience with a neighbor who I thought was a friend only to be told that you have to be nuts to believe in BF. We did not speak for months and barely do now.

The iteresting thing other than they go ape for a bit is it seems to be highly offensive to them. Not sure if they consider it a sign of disrespect or that you are marking their territory. Could be either or both. I was telling the late Dr John Bindernagel about the instances at a conference and he thought it highly interesting behavior and took notes. Another guy standing there listening said it had happened to him too. It is the classic gorrilla chest thumping thing which in one out of the two occurrances included a bluff charge too. Separate areas probably 30 miiles apart and and unlikely to have been the same BF. The bluff charge instance I was escorted back to my truck. It made sure that I heard it following me by breaking off stuff every now and then. Part of that was interesting in that it took a different route off trail than I did. It could easily have beaten me back and been waiting for me. That area still scares me. Last time I went in there the old logging road was so washed out in places I doubt that it is passible now.

There is no PROOF of this. Assertion, sure. Logic, sure. But proof, _absolutely_ false. I assume that certain regional / local offices probably have unofficial knowledge of bigfoot. That the knowledge rises far enough in the hierarchy for there to be an official policy, thus THE AGENCY hides anything at all from us remains unproven, and for certain "THE GOVERNMENT", meaning **all agencies** together, not just one, is hiding bigfoot from us, is patently ridiculous. Back to another false premise you assert. If there were reported sightings, of course I'd go and my kid would come along willingly. Unexplained kidnappings is an entirely different thing. I'd go. Would not take my kid. The notion that there's any connection is just that, and is without proof. Uh .. do you know what proof means? Because either way, you're misusing the word. MIB

"i'm marked" lol

A news report listed a biologist in the Jacobs family that was the first person that identified the figure as not a bear before the BFRO was involved. She studied the photos and told the hunter it was not a bear, she was biologist Krista Jacobs pictured here:

Thanks guys......I feel great, just the eye thing. I tried to hike yesterday but turned around pretty quick, as I have to be very precise where my feet land and is not possible right now, My vision on the left is up to 20-30 now, but not syncing with my 20-20 right eue, so the overall affect is not sharp, plus they injected a gas bubble in my left eye to push the retina back into place, and might take a month or more to go away.......goin' nuts wanting to get out there!

And it seems that the optimized conditions and scenario for a Sasquatch predation would be on a lone, unarmed hiker along a desolate trail surrounded by miles and miles of harsh terrain and just before a nasty front or weather system goes through the area. Bigfoots are probably smart enough to take advantage of the conditions that you mention. If you look at a decent chunk of the Missing 411 cases the victim is usually found miles and miles from the point of disappearance So these victims look like they have been transported a long ways away? I need to read more of these cases. Another thing that I think that gets overlooked is that the Squatch in question might not necessarily need to be old, sick, or injured to predate on a human. Just as we have "rogues" amongst humanity Yes ..........Janice Carter during Beast TV #83 pod cast said that some clans of bigfoots are hostle and people need to stay away from them. Are they cannibalistic? They eat meat and don' like people in their territory so why no?

Measurements were taken from the location with a model setup with cameras to account for discrepancies in angles of the creature and camera. They don’t reflect what proportions of a bear would be. The position in the second photo is more like something human sized proportions are capable of.

Actually I don't have great stills from the work. Issac did most of the work, and I just got a video sample. Not sure where it's filed. Will have to look around.