Leaderboard

Good morning, i'm in Ohio looking for like minded individuals to accompany me on a bigfoot expedition.im planning a 45-60 day trek in southern Ohio to find proof of the creatures existence.primative camping,tents and the hunt for proof.please message me with intrest.

Not sure if this was said in jest or not. I hear this often. We have no type specimen , we do not have 100% verified photographic evidence. All we have is conjecture and hearsay. Given the varied build and dimensions of humans and many other species in the world, physical attributes of a potential Sasquatch are yet to be determined in my opinion, they hold very little weight in determining the validity of photo or video evidence. Not meant as a slight to your comment redhawk, just an opportunity to climb on my soapbox regarding BF physicality in regards to determining a hoax or not.

Very interesting video. Thanks for sharing. Can’t help but feel like with most legends there is always a bit of room for embellishment. That being said, I’m sure early explorers certainly met up with people of much larger size than themselves. Early Spanish conquistadors were probably in the lower 5’ range from some sources I’ve read. Someone a little over 6’ would certainly seem large. My last doctors visit listed me at 6’3”. I feel considerably taller and bigger than people in the 5’10” or so range. My buddy is 6’9” and to me he seems massive in height and bulk. I wouldn’t call him a giant but he stands almost a foot taller than most and he really stands out in a room full of people. “Giants” may all be a matter of perspective.

Our incessant rain, wet snow, and wind have finally eased off, and the last few days have been sunny and spring-like, though there's still lots of wet, greasy snow as soon as you gain a bit of elevation in the local mountains. Today I took the opportunity to get out of the house for a while, going this morning to a local gun show with an old hunting buddy that I hadn't seen in person in almost a year. We spent a couple of hours perusing a lot of overpriced weaponry and gear, and all I bought was a nice leather wallet to replace my old worn out faux leather unit, while my buddy found a couple of pounds of powder that he wanted. We left there for lunch at a local eatery, then he headed off on a road trip with his lady friend, and I headed for the nearby mountain trails for some scouting and soul refreshing. The Heritage Arms show was in Chilliwack, so the closest option was the Chilliwack River Valley, and its many offshoot logging roads and trails. My first choice was Tamihi Creek, towards Border Peaks, and as expected, I encountered snow about 5km in, as the elevation increased. I continued on a few more km, but as the road climbed, the snow got deeper, and slicker, so I opted to turn around before I found myself needing a rescue, as happened a couple of months ago. Even so, I had gone a little too far in, and needed to deploy my traction boards and air the tires down to 15 psi to complete the turn around on the narrow, steep road. Once pointed downhill, the going was easy, and I went back down to the river valley, and followed another road that Gaia showed crossing from Chilliwack River over to the next valley west, Cultus Lake, but at a lower elevation than the Tamihi trail. I had never driven the route before, but the map proved to be correct, and it was a very pleasant 10km cruise over a scenic, but rough, narrow road through second growth forest, ending at the back side of the resort village of Cultus Lake. The only disappointment was not seeing any wildlife at all on the trails, and no tracks or droppings either. From there it was only a 20 minute drive back to Chilliwack, where I stopped at a service station to air the tires back up, and go through the car wash to get the mud off the H3 before heading home for supper. The whole day made me feel good, I really needed to get out there!

It would be difficult to pick the worst as there are so many choices. The idea of a Bigfoot Documentary as a concept is really simple: Does or could Bigfoot exist? Thus, a great documentary should make the best case as to why Bigfoot exists (or it doesn't). The best documentaries focus on that topic. If done well it will even score some points among skeptics who at least admit some of the other side's points are fair points. I think of Dr. Eric Began on one of these shows who complemented Jeff Meldrum and did leave open the possibility Bigfoot could exist. He gave the reasonable position as to why established science hold the position Bigfoot is not a proven thing. He even said he hoped Bigfoot does exist as it would be very interesting to his scientific discipline. He gave props to Meldrum because his position, argument, and reasonable points were respectful. That is quite a contrast vs Bobo appearing on Conan. Munns, Meldrum and others make great points in documentaries of these sorts. Thus, these are rated high on a scale of bad to good. Meanwhile you have shows like Finding Bigfoot. This show is so bad they talk of Bigfoot's like they know his favorite baseball team is or his favorite color. You have Bobo running around with a "Squatchin' hat saying every twig snap is a 'squatch" Those shows not only are harmful to the Bigfoot discussion, but they should be an embarrassment to any believer trying to make their best case to others Bigfoot could exist. I saw X Creatures which claimed to focus on the PGF. It was a really weak hit piece designed to attack the PGF (in a really ineffective and lazy way) to convince us the PGF was a hoax. I wish a PGF documentary could be put out where those who think it is a hoax have to actually make their best case (one better than x creatures). Focus on the film and let each side make their best case. What do we get instead? A bunch of embarrassing junk. Who is the poster boy of the Bigfoot is real argument? Bobo in a 'gone squatchin' hat. Imagine a public seeing a documentary where the following was presented: - PGF suit replicating failure using 1967 materials - and Munns like explanation of step by step of what the film shows with starts and stops - showing how the film was at its most stable point when Roger was closest to Patty near the time of the turn back -footprint evidence which goes with the PGF itself -Jim McClariins similar but not same traveling to the site for his walk the following spring. and so on. The truth is, most bigfoot documentaries I have watched on the subject are pretty bad and that is being kind. Here is your representative. And we wonder why they don't take the subject seriously... (I don't dislike Bobo or his passion but that is not the point)

Thanks DrPSH....good info there! I am finally able to drive better, especially at night, so hoping to get back out there in a week or two, Kodiak has turned into a lazy bum waiting for me, lol. Cheers:)

There is no PROOF of this. Assertion, sure. Logic, sure. But proof, _absolutely_ false. I assume that certain regional / local offices probably have unofficial knowledge of bigfoot. That the knowledge rises far enough in the hierarchy for there to be an official policy, thus THE AGENCY hides anything at all from us remains unproven, and for certain "THE GOVERNMENT", meaning **all agencies** together, not just one, is hiding bigfoot from us, is patently ridiculous. Back to another false premise you assert. If there were reported sightings, of course I'd go and my kid would come along willingly. Unexplained kidnappings is an entirely different thing. I'd go. Would not take my kid. The notion that there's any connection is just that, and is without proof. Uh .. do you know what proof means? Because either way, you're misusing the word. MIB

The limbs and everything about it are too human like. AND the suit is cheap