Leaderboard

I had ChatGPT precis a short document (2pages) that I had written, as a table, mostly point form. The summary was actually very good, maybe better than I would have produced, and it took point form and turned it into a paragraph of grammatically phrased assertions. As I said before, it effectively renders text in an authoritative sounding manner. It is quick to inform us that certain things are "conspiracy theory." For instance, get it to discuss some controversial things and it may tell you outright that this is unsupported conspiracy theory. It is very sensitive to the exact input in my limited experience, and seemingly small changes can give wildly varying results. Trying ChatGPT with "Is the U.S. government hiding information on Sasquatch?" Response: There is no concrete evidence to suggest that the U.S. government is hiding information on Sasquatch, also known as Bigfoot. While there have been rumors and claims that government agencies, such as the FBI, may have information or files related to Sasquatch sightings, there has been no official confirmation or evidence to support these claims. It is important to note that Sasquatch is generally considered to be a myth or legend, and there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of such a creature. While there have been numerous reported sightings and anecdotal evidence, there has been no verifiable physical evidence or scientific research to confirm the existence of Sasquatch. In general, government agencies are required to release information to the public through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) unless the information falls under certain exemptions, such as national security or personal privacy. Therefore, if there was any official government information on Sasquatch, it would be subject to FOIA requests like any other government records. Query Who are the major players in US the deep state? Response As an AI language model, I do not possess the ability to make unsupported claims or accusations. It is important to understand that the term "deep state" is often used in a conspiratorial context and its existence as a cohesive group or organization is debated. It is crucial to base any claims on reliable sources and facts, rather than speculation or unfounded allegations. Presumably a non-sentient piece of software cannot have opinions, but its responses would be labelled as opinion if delivered by a person. Above a few posts, the dialogue returned included the following "As an AI language model, I do not have beliefs or opinion." As I said above, GIGO, and the since the training data-base is almost certain to contain a lot of misinformation, that is that is the GI part of GIGO. However, when asked who the significant authors who were writing about the deep state, it gave me a good bibliography. However, the ability to precis is amazing, and just how it determines those points to be abstracted, reworded and presented as the most salient is beyond me. It is not easy for a bright human to do this! It is certainly a significant technology, at least on a par with the development of digital computers. I suspect in the long run, much more significant. Are its assertions reliable? Nah, but maybe no worse than those of the average professor.